[PATCH v3 4/8] perf cs-etm: Fix bitmap for option
leo.yan at linaro.org
Mon Feb 8 20:58:55 EST 2021
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 01:46:41PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 11:08:29PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> > From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
> > When set option with macros ETM_OPT_CTXTID and ETM_OPT_TS, it wrongly
> > takes these two values (14 and 28 prespectively) as bit masks, but
> > actually both are the offset for bits. But this doesn't lead to
> > further failure due to the AND logic operation will be always true for
> > ETM_OPT_CTXTID / ETM_OPT_TS.
> > This patch defines new independent macros (rather than using the
> > "config" bits) for requesting the "contextid" and "timestamp" for
> > cs_etm_set_option().
> > [leoy: Extract the change as a separate patch for easier review]
> This should go just above your name - see below.
> > Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan at linaro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
> [Extract the change as a separate patch for easier review]
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan at linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c | 12 ++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> > index bd446aba64f7..c25c878fd06c 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm/util/cs-etm.c
> > @@ -156,6 +156,10 @@ static int cs_etm_set_timestamp(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> > return err;
> > }
> > +#define ETM_SET_OPT_CTXTID (1 << 0)
> > +#define ETM_SET_OPT_TS (1 << 1)
> > +#define ETM_SET_OPT_MASK (ETM_SET_OPT_CTXTID | ETM_SET_OPT_TS)
> > +
> I would much rather see this fixed with the BIT() macro as it is done in the
> rest of this set than defining new constant.
> With the above:
> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org>
> I have picked up the kernel portion of this set. I suggest you fix the above
> and send another revision to Arnaldo with my RBs.
Will do this. Thanks for suggestion, Mathieu.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel