[PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: ipq6018: enable USB2 support
Baruch Siach
baruch at tkos.co.il
Sun Feb 7 04:08:25 EST 2021
Hi Kathiravan T,
Thanks for your review.
On Fri, Feb 05 2021, Kathiravan T wrote:
> On 2021-01-27 19:50, Baruch Siach wrote:
>> From: Kathiravan T <kathirav at codeaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan T <kathirav at codeaurora.org>
>> [baruch: adjust regs address/size; drop binding updates;
>> drop unsupported quirk properties]
>> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts | 8 ++++
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts
>> index 99cefe88f6f2..5aec18308712 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018-cp01-c1.dts
>> @@ -78,3 +78,11 @@ nand at 0 {
>> nand-bus-width = <8>;
>> };
>> };
>> +
>> +&qusb_phy_1 {
>> + status = "ok";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&usb2 {
>> + status = "ok";
>> +};
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>> index 9fa5b028e4f3..d4a3d4e4a7e9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>> @@ -524,6 +524,54 @@ qrtr_requests {
>> };
>> };
>> + qusb_phy_1: qusb at 59000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-qusb2-phy";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x059000 0x0 0x180>;
>> + #phy-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + clocks = <&gcc GCC_USB1_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
>> + <&xo>;
>> + clock-names = "cfg_ahb", "ref";
>
> As per the bindings, ref clock should be 19.2MHz where the XO in IPQ60xx is
> 24MHz. Did the USB enumerated successfully and able to perform read / write
> operations?
I managed to enumerate an Ethernet USB dongle with only this series
applied. But then I tested again with USB storage device. That only
worked with downstream clock adjust/period patch:
https://source.codeaurora.org/quic/qsdk/oss/kernel/linux-ipq-5.4/commit/?h=fig&id=707d8fa2b481888f4792edc6561e81999301cbcf
That patch applies cleanly on top of v5.11-rc4.
Is anyone at Codeaurora pushing the dwc3 clock patch upstream? Should I
do that?
Thanks,
baruch
--
~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch at tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list