[PATCH v17 1/7] arm/arm64: Probe for the presence of KVM hypervisor
Will Deacon
will at kernel.org
Fri Feb 5 12:00:06 EST 2021
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 04:50:27PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2021-02-05 11:19, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 09:11:00AM +0000, Steven Price wrote:
> > > On 02/02/2021 14:11, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < 32; ++i) {
> > > > + if (res.a0 & (i))
> > > > + set_bit(i + (32 * 0), __kvm_arm_hyp_services);
> > > > + if (res.a1 & (i))
> > > > + set_bit(i + (32 * 1), __kvm_arm_hyp_services);
> > > > + if (res.a2 & (i))
> > > > + set_bit(i + (32 * 2), __kvm_arm_hyp_services);
> > > > + if (res.a3 & (i))
> > > > + set_bit(i + (32 * 3), __kvm_arm_hyp_services);
> > >
> > > The bit shifts are missing, the tests should be of the form:
> > >
> > > if (res.a0 & (1 << i))
> > >
> > > Or indeed using a BIT() macro.
> >
> > Maybe even test_bit()?
>
> Actually, maybe not doing things a-bit-at-a-time is less error prone.
> See below what I intend to fold in.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
> b/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
> index 00bf3c7969fc..08836f2f39ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/smccc/kvm_guest.c
> @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "smccc: KVM: " fmt
>
> -#include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
>
> @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(__kvm_arm_hyp_services,
> ARM_SMCCC_KVM_NUM_FUNCS) __ro_afte
>
> void __init kvm_init_hyp_services(void)
> {
> - int i;
> struct arm_smccc_res res;
> + u32 val[4];
>
> if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() != SMCCC_CONDUIT_HVC)
> return;
> @@ -28,16 +28,13 @@ void __init kvm_init_hyp_services(void)
>
> memset(&res, 0, sizeof(res));
> arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_KVM_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, &res);
> - for (i = 0; i < 32; ++i) {
> - if (res.a0 & (i))
> - set_bit(i + (32 * 0), __kvm_arm_hyp_services);
> - if (res.a1 & (i))
> - set_bit(i + (32 * 1), __kvm_arm_hyp_services);
> - if (res.a2 & (i))
> - set_bit(i + (32 * 2), __kvm_arm_hyp_services);
> - if (res.a3 & (i))
> - set_bit(i + (32 * 3), __kvm_arm_hyp_services);
> - }
> +
> + val[0] = lower_32_bits(res.a0);
> + val[1] = lower_32_bits(res.a1);
> + val[2] = lower_32_bits(res.a2);
> + val[3] = lower_32_bits(res.a3);
> +
> + bitmap_from_arr32(__kvm_arm_hyp_services, val, ARM_SMCCC_KVM_NUM_FUNCS);
Nice! That's loads better.
Will
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list