[GIT PULL] arm64: dts: updates for v5.17
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Wed Dec 29 17:40:03 PST 2021
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 10:29 AM Matthias Brugger
<matthias.bgg at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20/12/2021 17:18, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 9:42 AM Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Please take a look on the below patches for aarch64 based MediaTek boards.
> >> In this round we add support for the mt8183 based Acer Crhomebook 314, as well
> >> as we add support to several SKUs for mt8183 based Chromebooks.
> >> Apart from that we add basic support to the mt7986 in both variants (mt7986a,
> >> mt7986b). The difference between the both SoCs are the pin-controller capabilities.
> >>
> >> Hope you are fine with this pull request.
> >
> > I've pulled both tags, but I have two minor comments:
> >
> > - please put "mediatek" into the subject, that helps when looking at
> > the pull requests
> > with pwclient, which does not show the author by default
> >
>
> I did this pull request with a lot of time pressure and forgot about it. My
> apologies, I'll try to not forget next time.
>
> > - I was expecting you to send a branch for the new EN7523 SoC as well. Did that
> > end up not making it in time?
> >
>
> As I have seen, in the meantime you reviewed some parts yourself. I took the
> first two patches in my tree, but we should coordinate for the rest. If you
> want to take it through the SOC tree or if I should take it through the mediatek
> tree. As Airoha is a subsidiary of MediaTek, I suppose in the long run, you want
> it do be part of the Mediatek tree, correct?
I talked to Felix about it last week, I think it would be best if you handle the
arch/{arm,arm64}/ bits for Airoha as part of the mach-mediatek and merge
changes the same way as the mt76xx, mt69xx and mt81xx series. For the
initial submission, of en7623, having a single branch that contains both
the arch/* and drivers/* with the appropriate Acks would make the most
sense, to avoid spreading it out over multiple merge windows, though it's
not too late for 5.17.
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list