[PATCH 3/4] media: aspeed: Correct values for detected timing
Jammy Huang
jammy_huang at aspeedtech.com
Tue Dec 21 22:11:58 PST 2021
Hi Joel,
OK, I will update in next patch as you advised.
Thanks for your review.
On 2021/12/22 上午 09:31, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 09:54, Jammy Huang <jammy_huang at aspeedtech.com> wrote:
>> Correct timing's fp/sync/bp value based on the information below.
>> It should be noticed that the calculation formula should be changed
>> per sync polarity.
>>
>> The sequence of signal: sync - backporch - video data - frontporch
>>
>> The following registers start counting from sync's rising edge:
>> 1. VR090: frame edge's left and right
>> 2. VR094: frame edge's top and bottom
>> 3. VR09C: counting from sync's rising edge to falling edge
>>
>> +--+ +-------------------+ +--+
>> | | | v i d e o | | |
>> +--+ +-----+ +-----+ +---+
>>
>> sync+--+
>> left/top+--------+
>> right/bottom+----------------------------+
>>
>> +-------------------+
>> | v i d e o |
>> +--+ +-----+ +-----+ +---+
>> | | | |
>> +--+ +--+
>> sync+-------------------------------+
>> left/top+-----+
>> right/bottom+-------------------------+
> This is a good explanation. Can you add detail that relates the names
> you use here to to the variable names in your patch (or change them to
> match)?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jammy Huang <jammy_huang at aspeedtech.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c b/drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c
>> index 581a4261f9b7..5ad3a20c5bac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c
>> @@ -988,10 +988,20 @@ static void aspeed_video_get_resolution(struct aspeed_video *video)
>> src_tb_edge);
>> video->frame_top = FIELD_GET(VE_SRC_TB_EDGE_DET_TOP,
>> src_tb_edge);
>> - det->vfrontporch = video->frame_top;
>> - det->vbackporch = FIELD_GET(VE_MODE_DETECT_V_LINES, mds) -
>> - video->frame_bottom;
>> det->vsync = FIELD_GET(VE_SYNC_STATUS_VSYNC, sync);
>
> Would it be clearer if you structured the code like this?
>
> vsync = FIELD_GET(VE_SYNC_STATUS_VSYNC, sync);
> vlines = FIELD_GET(VE_MODE_DETECT_V_LINES, mds);
>
> if (det->polarities & V4L2_DV_VSYNC_POS_POL)) {
> det->vbackporch = video->frame_top - vsync;
> det->vfrontporch = vlines - video->frame_bottom;
> det->vsync = vsync;
> } else {
> det->vbackporch = video->frame_top;
> det->vfrontporch = vlines - video->frame_bottom - vsync;
> det->vsync = vlines - vsync;
>
> }
>
>
>> + if (det->polarities & V4L2_DV_VSYNC_POS_POL) {
>> + det->vbackporch = video->frame_top - det->vsync;
>> + det->vfrontporch =
>> + FIELD_GET(VE_MODE_DETECT_V_LINES, mds) -
>> + video->frame_bottom;
>> + } else {
>> + det->vsync = FIELD_GET(VE_MODE_DETECT_V_LINES, mds) -
>> + det->vsync;
>> + det->vbackporch = video->frame_top;
>> + det->vfrontporch =
>> + FIELD_GET(VE_MODE_DETECT_V_LINES, mds) -
>> + video->frame_bottom - det->vsync;
>> + }
>> if (video->frame_top > video->frame_bottom)
>> continue;
>>
>> @@ -999,9 +1009,16 @@ static void aspeed_video_get_resolution(struct aspeed_video *video)
>> src_lr_edge);
>> video->frame_left = FIELD_GET(VE_SRC_LR_EDGE_DET_LEFT,
>> src_lr_edge);
>> - det->hfrontporch = video->frame_left;
>> - det->hbackporch = htotal - video->frame_right;
>> det->hsync = FIELD_GET(VE_SYNC_STATUS_HSYNC, sync);
>> + if (det->polarities & V4L2_DV_HSYNC_POS_POL) {
>> + det->hbackporch = video->frame_left - det->hsync;
>> + det->hfrontporch = htotal - video->frame_right;
>> + } else {
>> + det->hsync = htotal - det->hsync;
>> + det->hbackporch = video->frame_left;
>> + det->hfrontporch = htotal - video->frame_right -
>> + det->hsync;
>> + }
>> if (video->frame_left > video->frame_right)
>> continue;
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
--
Best Regards
Jammy
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list