[RESEND v4 10/10] dt-bindings: serial: fsl-lpuart: Add i.MX8DXL compatible

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 11:58:46PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 21-12-17 17:59:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 08:48:14PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > > Add i.MX8DXL lpuart compatible to the bindings documentation.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa at nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml | 4 ++++
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml
> > > index fa23c60a01d0..ee37aa125c86 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml
> > > @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ properties:
> > >        - items:
> > >            - const: fsl,imx8qm-lpuart
> > >            - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart
> > > +      - items:
> > > +          - const: fsl,imx8dxl-lpuart
> > > +          - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart
> > > +          - const: fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart
> > 
> > Why is "- items:" listed twice here?
> 
> There are actually 3 "- items:" and there is a "oneOf:" 
> that encloses all of these.
> 
> Unfortunately, there are special cases within the driver
> that forces the devicetree nodes to have a different list of
> compatibles for almost each SoC.

Ah.  Can you resend it as it is long-gone from my queue now.

thanks,

greg k-h