[PATCH v1 1/1] serial: 8520_mtk: Prepare for platform_get_irq_optional() changes

Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Fri Dec 17 10:09:29 PST 2021


On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 05:54:55PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 05:10:34PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The platform_get_irq_optional() is going to be changed in a way
> > that the result of it:
> >    = 0 means no IRQ is provided
> >    < 0 means the error which needs to be propagated to the upper layers
> >    > 0 valid vIRQ is allocated
> 
> What about 0 being a valid irq?

For this driver it can't be possible. The driver is instantiated via DT only
and OF APIs never return 0 for IRQ. If it's the case, it's a regression in the
OF APIs.

I can elaborate in the commit message.

> > In this case, drop check for 0. Note, the 0 is not valid vIRQ and
> > platform_get_irq_optional() issues a big WARN() in such case,
> 
> But it still is a valid irq, so why did you just break things?  Yes, a
> warning will happen, but the driver and platform will still work.

In general yes, but not in this case. See above.

...

> > -	if (irq >= 0)
> > +	if (irq > 0)
> >  		disable_irq_wake(irq);
> 
> Why change this now?  What does this solve at this point in time?

As explained in the commit message, it's a preparation patch to fix the logic
behind platform_get_irq_optional().

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko





More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list