[PATCH v1 1/1] serial: 8520_mtk: Prepare for platform_get_irq_optional() changes
Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com
Fri Dec 17 10:09:29 PST 2021
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 05:54:55PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 05:10:34PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The platform_get_irq_optional() is going to be changed in a way
> > that the result of it:
> > = 0 means no IRQ is provided
> > < 0 means the error which needs to be propagated to the upper layers
> > > 0 valid vIRQ is allocated
>
> What about 0 being a valid irq?
For this driver it can't be possible. The driver is instantiated via DT only
and OF APIs never return 0 for IRQ. If it's the case, it's a regression in the
OF APIs.
I can elaborate in the commit message.
> > In this case, drop check for 0. Note, the 0 is not valid vIRQ and
> > platform_get_irq_optional() issues a big WARN() in such case,
>
> But it still is a valid irq, so why did you just break things? Yes, a
> warning will happen, but the driver and platform will still work.
In general yes, but not in this case. See above.
...
> > - if (irq >= 0)
> > + if (irq > 0)
> > disable_irq_wake(irq);
>
> Why change this now? What does this solve at this point in time?
As explained in the commit message, it's a preparation patch to fix the logic
behind platform_get_irq_optional().
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list