[PATCH v2 0/5] arm64: PMU updates

Robin Murphy robin.murphy at arm.com
Tue Dec 14 11:02:57 PST 2021


On 2021-12-14 18:33, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:16:12 +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> Here's v2, with the DSU binding actually finished (oh the shame...) and
>> the NVIDIA PMU patch pulled in to benefit from the cleanup and keep
>> things manageably together. The initial binding patch from v1 is no
>> longer included since Rob has picked it up separately.
>>
>> Refactoring arm_pmu's probing to be more modular turns out to be a
>> substantial yak to shave, so in the end I decided it *is* worth
>> implementing Mark's macro suggestion now - after all, it can simply be
>> converted from a function template to a structure template as and when
>> the time comes.
>>
>> [...]
> 
> Applied first three to will (for-next/perf-cpu), thanks!
> 
> [1/5] arm64: perf: Support Denver and Carmel PMUs
>        https://git.kernel.org/will/c/d4c4844a9b47
> [2/5] arm64: perf: Simplify registration boilerplate
>        https://git.kernel.org/will/c/6ac9f30bd43b
> [3/5] arm64: perf: Support new DT compatibles
>        https://git.kernel.org/will/c/893c34b60a59

Thanks Will! Just to clarify, are you leaving the DSU binding patches 
for Rob to pick up, or waiting for the typo to get fixed? (and if the 
former - Rob, would you like me to resend a v3 with the typo fixed?)

Cheers,
Robin.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list