[PATCH 2/3] arm64: perf: Support Denver and Carmel PMUs

[Will Deacon]

On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 03:36:02PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 04:03:25PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
> > > 
> > > Add support for the NVIDIA Denver and Carmel PMUs using the generic
> > > PMUv3 event map for now.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> > > index b4044469527e..8c8cf369c450 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> > > @@ -1247,6 +1247,18 @@ static int armv8_vulcan_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> > >  				       armv8_vulcan_map_event);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static int armv8_denver_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> > > +{
> > > +	return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_denver",
> > > +				       armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int armv8_carmel_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> > > +{
> > > +	return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_carmel",
> > > +				       armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
> > >  	{.compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3",	.data = armv8_pmuv3_init},
> > >  	{.compatible = "arm,cortex-a34-pmu",	.data = armv8_a34_pmu_init},
> > > @@ -1265,6 +1277,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
> > >  	{.compatible = "arm,neoverse-n1-pmu",	.data = armv8_n1_pmu_init},
> > >  	{.compatible = "cavium,thunder-pmu",	.data = armv8_thunder_pmu_init},
> > >  	{.compatible = "brcm,vulcan-pmu",	.data = armv8_vulcan_pmu_init},
> > > +	{.compatible = "nvidia,denver-pmu",	.data = armv8_denver_pmu_init},
> > > +	{.compatible = "nvidia,carmel-pmu",	.data = armv8_carmel_pmu_init},
> > 
> > Super trivial nit, but could we please organise this alphabetically (i.e. with carmel first?)
> > 
> > With that:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
> > 
> > I see now that we messed up the order of "cavium,thunder-pmu" and
> > "brcm,vulcan-pmu", but otherwise this is ordered, and it's be nice to keep it
> > that way. I can fix the order of those two in a separate patch.
> 
> I ordered this chronologically (Denver for Tegra186 and Carmel for
> Tegra194), which seemed a bit more natural, but I can reorder this
> alphabetically if you prefer.
> 
> Would Will be the right person to pick this up or should I take it
> through the Tegra tree and then ARM SoC?

Sorry, I missed this somehow. I've got some perf patches pending already, so
it would be easiest for me to take this one directly (and then I can apply
Robin's stuff on top). Is that ok?

Will