[PATCH v2] arm64/xor: use EOR3 instructions when available
Catalin Marinas
catalin.marinas at arm.com
Tue Dec 14 03:36:24 PST 2021
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:05:34PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 09:19, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > + Arnd
> >
> > On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 03:37, Nathan Chancellor <nathan at kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Ard,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 03:02:52PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > > Use the EOR3 instruction to implement xor_blocks() if the instruction is
> > > > available, which is the case if the CPU implements the SHA-3 extension.
> > > > This is about 20% faster on Apple M1 when using the 5-way version.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb at kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Our CI reported that this patch as commit ce9ba49a2460 ("arm64/xor: use
> > > EOR3 instructions when available") in the arm64 tree breaks
> > > allyesconfig:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration2/runs/4514540083?check_suite_focus=true
> > >
> > > I also see this when building with GCC 11.2.0:
> > >
> > > WARNING: modpost: EXPORT symbol "xor_block_inner_neon" [vmlinux] version ...
> > > Is "xor_block_inner_neon" prototyped in <asm/asm-prototypes.h>?
> > > aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: arch/arm64/lib/xor-neon.o: relocation R_AARCH64_ABS32 against `__crc_xor_block_inner_neon' can not be used when making a shared object
> >
> > I suspect this is another genksyms crash, preventing the
> > __crc_xor_block_inner_neon symbol from ever being emitted.
> >
> > This is a recurring annoyance and I am not sure how to address this
> > properly. Arnd might have some thoughts on the matter as well.
>
> I managed to reproduce this: it's not a crash but definitely a bug in
> genksyms, as it simply fails to produce the output containing the
> assignment of __crc_xor_block_inner_neon.
>
> Moving the definition of xor_block_inner_neon as below works around the issue.
>
> Catalin: would you like me to spin a v3? Or do your prefer to just
> fold this into the existing one?
I'll fold it in. Thanks.
--
Catalin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list