[PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: meson: add pinctrl driver support for Meson-S4 Soc

[Jerome Brunet]

On Tue 14 Dec 2021 at 10:21, Qianggui Song <qianggui.song at amlogic.com> wrote:

> Add new pinctrl driver for Amlogic's Meson-S4 SoC which share the
> same register laytout as the previous Meson-A1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qianggui Song <qianggui.song at amlogic.com>
> ---

[...]

> +
> +/* Bank D func1 */
> +static const unsigned int uart_b_tx_d_pins[]		= { GPIOD_0 };
> +static const unsigned int uart_b_rx_d_pins[]		= { GPIOD_1 };
> +static const unsigned int uart_b_cts_d_pins[]		= { GPIOD_2 };
> +static const unsigned int uart_b_rts_d_pins[]		= { GPIOD_3 };

Your S805x2 documenation says the 4 pins above are HDMI related for func 1

> +static const unsigned int remote_out_pins[]		= { GPIOD_4 };
> +static const unsigned int remote_in_pins[]		= { GPIOD_5 };

SPDIF for those 2

> +static const unsigned int jtag_1_clk_pins[]		= { GPIOD_6 };
> +static const unsigned int jtag_1_tms_pins[]		= { GPIOD_7 };
> +static const unsigned int jtag_1_tdi_pins[]		= { GPIOD_8 };
> +static const unsigned int jtag_1_tdo_pins[]		= { GPIOD_9 };

I2C for those 4

It goes on like this for the rest of GPIO Bank D and I did not check the
other banks

Could you please clarify
* Does the S4 applies to S805X2, S905Y4, Both ?
* Is the S805X2 Datasheet Revision 0.4 accurate ?

> +static const unsigned int clk12_24_pins[]		= { GPIOD_10 };
> +static const unsigned int pwm_g_hiz_pins[]		= { GPIOD_11 };
> +

[...]

> +
> +static const char * const tdm_groups[] = {
> +	"tdm_d2_c", "tdm_d3_c", "tdm_fs1_c", "tdm_d4_c", "tdm_d5_c",
> +	"tdm_fs1_d", "tdm_d4_d", "tdm_d3_d", "tdm_d2_d", "tdm_sclk1_d",
> +	"tdm_sclk1_h", "tdm_fs1_h", "tdm_d2_h", "tdm_d3_h", "tdm_d4_h",
> +	"tdm_d1", "tdm_d0", "tdm_fs0", "tdm_sclk0", "tdm_fs2", "tdm_sclk2",
> +	"tdm_d4_z", "tdm_d5_z", "tdm_d6", "tdm_d7"
> +};

On previous chip, there were pin assigned to tdm A, B or C.
On this generation, it seems you have added a second level on pinmuxing
to re-route the audio pins to different controllers

In such case, I don't think they belong in the same group.
Depending on settins, D2 and D3 could be unrelated

I think each audio pin should have its own group (one group for D3, one
D4, etc ...)

> +
> +static const char * const mclk_groups[] = {
> +	"mclk_1_c", "mclk_1_d", "mclk_1_h", "mclk_2"
> +
> +};

mclk_1 and mclk_2 should be in separate groups

> +
> +static const char * const remote_out_groups[] = {
> +	"remote_out"
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const remote_in_groups[] = {
> +	"remote_in"
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const clk12_24_groups[] = {
> +	"clk12_24"
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const clk_32k_in_groups[] = {
> +	"clk_32k_in"
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const pwm_a_hiz_groups[] = {
> +	"pwm_a_hiz"
> +};
> +

I'm curious to know what the pwm hiz function is ?