[PATCH v2 6/6] drivers: remoteproc: Add Xilinx r5 remoteproc driver
Mathieu Poirier
mathieu.poirier at linaro.org
Mon Dec 13 10:39:56 PST 2021
[...]
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
> > > +{
> > > + int tcm_bank_count, tcm_node;
> > > + int i = 0, j;
> > > + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> > > + const struct mem_bank_data *tcm = zynqmp_tcm_banks;
> > > + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
> > > +
> > > + /* ToDo: Use predefined TCM address space values from driver until
> > > + * system-dt spec is not final fot TCM
> > > + */
> > Multilined comment should be as follow:
> >
> > /*
> > * ToDo: Use predefined TCM address space values from driver until
> > * system-dt spec is not final fot TCM
> > */
> >
> > s/"final fot TCM"/"final for TCM"
> >
> > Any reason this can't be done with "reg" properties like TI did for K3? It
> > would be nice to have TCMs included in the yaml file example.
> >
> R5 TCM on Xilinx platforms contains separate power-domains than RPU
> power-domains. So, I believe they can be operated separately than RPU. That
> is why I chose not to include as reg property. I believe we will include TCM
> as sram property in future.
>
> Now, explanation about why TCM is hardcode in driver:
>
> When I started developing driver, system-dt spec was in progress, to avoid
> extra maintenance effort I defined TCM information in driver instead of
> defining them in YAML.
> I agree with idea that there is no need to maintain two separate bindings
> and until system-dt specs are maturing we can hardcode TCM related
> information driver. This was discussed previously here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_JsqLGo380SRYska+xGgJhgF8NCRvY56ewafvSCU6c-LmhZw@mail.gmail.com/
>
Thanks for the link.
> Patchwork link for the same: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-remoteproc/patch/1587749770-15082-5-git-send-email-ben.levinsky@xilinx.com/#23414963
>
> Also, I will sync with system-dt team about its current status and keep
> updating about system-dt specs.
>
> Please let me know your opinion / suggestion for any alternative approach.
>
There is no point in burdening Rob any further than he already is - for the time
being the current approach will work.
>
> I agree with rest of the comments in this thread, and I will address them
> all in next revision.
>
> > > + tcm_bank_count = ARRAY_SIZE(zynqmp_tcm_banks);
> > > +
> > > + /* count per core tcm banks */
> > > + tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count / cluster->core_count;
> > > +
> > > + /* r5 core 0 will use all of TCM banks in lockstep mode.
> > > + * In split mode, r5 core0 will use 128k and r5 core1 will use another
> > > + * 128k. Assign TCM banks to each core accordingly
> > > + */
> > > + tcm_node = 0;
> > > + for (j = 0; j < cluster->core_count; j++) {
> > > + r5_core = &cluster->r5_cores[j];
> > > + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct mem_bank_data) *
> > > + tcm_bank_count, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(r5_core->tcm_banks))
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < tcm_bank_count; i++) {
> > > + /* Use pre-defined TCM reg values.
> > > + * Eventually this should be replaced by values
> > > + * parsed from dts.
> > > + */
> > > + r5_core->tcm_banks[i].addr = tcm[tcm_node].addr;
> > > + r5_core->tcm_banks[i].size = tcm[tcm_node].size;
> > > + r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id = tcm[tcm_node].pm_domain_id;
> > > + r5_core->tcm_banks[i].bank_name = tcm[tcm_node].bank_name;
> > > + tcm_node++;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
> > > +{
> > > + int res_mem_count, i;
> > > + struct device *dev;
> > > + struct device_node *np, *rmem_np;
> > > + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> > > +
> > > + dev = r5_core->dev;
> > > +
> > > + np = r5_core->np;
> > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(np)) {
> > > + pr_err("invalid device node of r5 core\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + res_mem_count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region",
> > > + sizeof(phandle));
> > > + if (res_mem_count <= 0) {
> > > + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get memory-region property %d\n",
> > > + res_mem_count);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + r5_core->res_mem = devm_kzalloc(dev,
> > > + res_mem_count * sizeof(struct reserved_mem),
> > > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!r5_core->res_mem) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate mem region memory\n");
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < res_mem_count; i++) {
> > > + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i);
> > > + if (!rmem_np)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
> > > + if (!rmem) {
> > > + of_node_put(rmem_np);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + memcpy(&r5_core->res_mem[i], rmem,
> > > + sizeof(struct reserved_mem));
> > > + of_node_put(rmem_np);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + r5_core->res_mem_count = res_mem_count;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
> > > +{
> > > + int ret, i;
> > > + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
> > > + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
> > > +
> > > + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
> > > + r5_core = &cluster->r5_cores[i];
> > > + if (!r5_core) {
> > > + pr_err("invalid r5 core\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(r5_core);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + dev_warn(dev, "memory-region prop failed %d\n", ret);
> > > +
> > > + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(r5_core->np, "power-domains",
> > > + 1, &r5_core->pm_domain_id);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to get power-domains property\n");
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = zynqmp_r5_set_mode(r5_core, cluster->mode);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(r5_core);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core %d\n", i);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
> > > +{
> > > + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
> > > + struct device_node *dev_node = dev_of_node(dev);
> > > + struct device_node *child;
> > > + struct platform_device *child_pdev;
> > > + int core_count = 0, ret, i;
> > > + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode cluster_mode = LOCKSTEP_MODE;
> > > + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_cores;
> > > +
> > > + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode", &cluster_mode);
> > > +
> > > + /* on success returns 0, if not defined then returns -EINVAL,
> > > + * In that case, default is LOCKSTEP mode
> > > + */
> > > + if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != 0) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Invalid xlnx,cluster-mode property\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (cluster_mode == SINGLE_CPU_MODE) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "driver does not support single cpu mode\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + } else if ((cluster_mode != SPLIT_MODE &&
> > > + cluster_mode != LOCKSTEP_MODE)) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Invalid cluster mode\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev_node);
> > > + if (core_count <= 0) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores %d", core_count);
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE && core_count != 2) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores for split mode\n");
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + } else if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE && core_count == 2) {
> > > + dev_warn(dev, "Only r5 core0 will be used\n");
> > > + core_count = 1;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + r5_cores = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core) *
> > > + core_count, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(r5_cores)) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "can't allocate memory for cores\n");
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + i = 0;
> > > + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_node, child) {
> > > + child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
> > > + if (!child_pdev)
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > > + r5_cores[i].dev = &child_pdev->dev;
> > > + if (!r5_cores[i].dev) {
> > > + pr_err("can't get device for r5 core %d\n", i);
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + r5_cores[i].np = dev_of_node(r5_cores[i].dev);
> > > + if (!r5_cores[i].np) {
> > > + pr_err("can't get device node for r5 core %d\n", i);
> > > + return -ENODEV;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + i++;
> > > + if (i == core_count)
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + cluster->mode = cluster_mode;
> > > + cluster->core_count = core_count;
> > > + cluster->r5_cores = r5_cores;
> > > +
> > > + ret = zynqmp_r5_core_init(cluster);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core err %d\n", ret);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + zynqmp_r5_print_dt_node_info(cluster);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(void *data)
> > > +{
> > > + struct platform_device *pdev = (struct platform_device *)data;
> > > +
> > > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
> > > +
> > > + pr_info("Exit r5f subsystem driver\n");
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe()
> > > + *
> > > + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster
> > > + *
> > > + * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT,
> > > + * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations
> > > + *
> > > + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
> > > + */
> > > +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > +{
> > > + int ret;
> > > + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
> > > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > +
> > > + cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cluster))
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > Function devm_kzalloc() does not return an code on error, just NULL. Please fix
> > throughout the driver.
> >
> > > +
> > > + cluster->dev = dev;
> > > +
> > > + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "failed to populate platform dev %d\n", ret);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */
> > > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster);
> > > +
> > > + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit, pdev);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + ret = zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(cluster);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(dev, "Invalid r5f subsystem device tree\n");
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + dev_info(dev, "Xilinx r5f remoteproc driver probe success\n");
> > Please remove this.
> >
> > I am out of time for today and will continue on Monday.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mathieu
> >
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/* Match table for OF platform binding */
> > > +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = {
> > > + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss", },
> > > + { /* end of list */ },
> > > +};
> > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
> > > +
> > > +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
> > > + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
> > > + .driver = {
> > > + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
> > > + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
> > > + },
> > > +};
> > > +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
> > > +
> > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
> > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
> > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list