[PATCH v2] ARM: dts: bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io: Add rtc on a pinctrl-muxed i2c bus

[Maxime Ripard]

On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 10:21:39PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I used the wrong git wrapper so this patch appeared with the wrong sender
> address. If need be I can resend from the address used in the S-o-b.

Your SoB seems to match the From header, so unless you'd like to
contribute with your pengutronix it should be fine?

> On 12/9/21 19:18, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe at kleine-koenig.org>
> > 
> > The cm4-io board comes with an PCF85063. Add it to the device tree to make
> > it usable. The i2c0 bus can use two different pinmux settings to use
> > different pins. To keep the bus appearing on the usual pin pair (gpio0 +
> > gpio1) use a pinctrl-muxed setting as the upstream dts does.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe at kleine-koenig.org>
> > ---
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io.dts | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io.dts
> > index 19600b629be5..5ddad146b541 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2711-rpi-cm4-io.dts
> > @@ -18,6 +18,41 @@ led-pwr {
> >   			linux,default-trigger = "default-on";
> >   		};
> >   	};
> > +
> > +	i2c0mux {
> > +		compatible = "i2c-mux-pinctrl";
> > +		#address-cells = <1>;
> > +		#size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > +		i2c-parent = <&i2c0>;
> > +
> > +		pinctrl-names = "i2c0", "i2c0-vc";
> > +		pinctrl-0 = <&i2c0_gpio0>;
> > +		pinctrl-1 = <&i2c0_gpio44>;
> > +
> > +		i2c at 0 {
> > +			reg = <0>;
> > +			#address-cells = <1>;
> > +			#size-cells = <0>;
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		i2c at 1 {
> > +			reg = <1>;
> > +			#address-cells = <1>;
> > +			#size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > +			rtc at 51 {
> > +				/* Attention: An alarm resets the machine */
> > +				compatible = "nxp,pcf85063";
> > +				reg = <0x51>;
> > +			};
> > +		};
> > +	};
> > +};
> > +
> > +&i2c0 {
> > +	/delete-property/ pinctrl-names;
> > +	/delete-property/ pinctrl-0;
> >   };
> >   &ddc0 {
> 
> Just some further information:
> 
> Cyril (who I talked to on irc) and I found that not only i2c0 can be used to
> access the gpio bus on pins 44/45 (as I did in v1) but that also &i2c1 can
> drive these pins. However similar to &i2c0, &i2c1 is used on pins 2/3 per
> default and so is also available on the default gpio header.
> 
> Also note that this is a breaking change, because overlays that added
> devices to &i2c0 before (expecting them to be accessed via gpio0/1) need to
> modify /i2c0mux/i2c at 0 now instead of /soc/i2c at 7e205000 (aka &i2c0).

We can mitigate that by setting the i2c0 label to the /i2c0mux/i2c at 0
node, since the overlay will not resolve what i2c0 is connected to until
it's applied.

Also, I think it's worth noting that this change will mimic what the RPi
kernel is doing.

Maxime
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20211213/4dd285a2/attachment.sig>