[PATCH 3/5] arm64: perf: Support new DT compatibles
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Tue Dec 7 11:14:29 PST 2021
On 2021-12-07 18:44, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 06:20:41PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> Wire up the new DT compatibles so we can present appropriate
>> PMU names to userspace for the latest and greatest CPUs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>> index 57720372da62..3fe4dcfc28d4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
>> @@ -1215,6 +1215,26 @@ static int armv8_a78_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
>> return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_cortex_a78", NULL);
>> }
>>
>> +static int armv9_a510_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
>> +{
>> + return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv9_cortex_a510", NULL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int armv9_a710_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
>> +{
>> + return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv9_cortex_a710", NULL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int armv8_x1_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
>> +{
>> + return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_cortex_x1", NULL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int armv9_x2_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
>> +{
>> + return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv9_cortex_x2", NULL);
>> +}
>
> I wonder if it'd be better to do something like:
>
> #define PMU_INIT_SIMPLE(name) \
> static int name##_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu) \
> {
> return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, #name, NULL); \
> }
>
> PMU_INIT_SIMPLE(armv9_cortex_a510)
> PMU_INIT_SIMPLE(armv9_cortex_a710)
> PMU_INIT_SIMPLE(armv8_xortex_x1)
> PMU_INIT_SIMPLE(armv9_xortex_x2)
>
> ... and fix up the armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] table to use the longer init names
> that results in?
Indeed I did ponder doing almost exactly that, but at that point I'd
rather try refactoring a bit deeper to convert most of the arm_pmu init
business to pure data, so I figured I'd chuck in the simple tweak to
mitigate these new additions with minimal churn, then have a go at the
bigger change in its own right.
> Otherwise, looks good to me.
Thanks!
Robin.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
>> +
>> static int armv8_e1_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
>> {
>> return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_neoverse_e1", NULL);
>> @@ -1225,6 +1245,16 @@ static int armv8_n1_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
>> return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_neoverse_n1", NULL);
>> }
>>
>> +static int armv9_n2_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
>> +{
>> + return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv9_neoverse_n2", NULL);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int armv8_v1_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
>> +{
>> + return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_neoverse_v1", NULL);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int armv8_thunder_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
>> {
>> return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_cavium_thunder",
>> @@ -1251,8 +1281,14 @@ static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
>> {.compatible = "arm,cortex-a76-pmu", .data = armv8_a76_pmu_init},
>> {.compatible = "arm,cortex-a77-pmu", .data = armv8_a77_pmu_init},
>> {.compatible = "arm,cortex-a78-pmu", .data = armv8_a78_pmu_init},
>> + {.compatible = "arm,cortex-a510-pmu", .data = armv9_a510_pmu_init},
>> + {.compatible = "arm,cortex-a710-pmu", .data = armv9_a710_pmu_init},
>> + {.compatible = "arm,cortex-x1-pmu", .data = armv8_x1_pmu_init},
>> + {.compatible = "arm,cortex-x2-pmu", .data = armv9_x2_pmu_init},
>> {.compatible = "arm,neoverse-e1-pmu", .data = armv8_e1_pmu_init},
>> {.compatible = "arm,neoverse-n1-pmu", .data = armv8_n1_pmu_init},
>> + {.compatible = "arm,neoverse-n2-pmu", .data = armv9_n2_pmu_init},
>> + {.compatible = "arm,neoverse-v1-pmu", .data = armv8_v1_pmu_init},
>> {.compatible = "cavium,thunder-pmu", .data = armv8_thunder_pmu_init},
>> {.compatible = "brcm,vulcan-pmu", .data = armv8_vulcan_pmu_init},
>> {},
>> --
>> 2.28.0.dirty
>>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list