[PATCH v3 00/11] Apple SoC PMGR device power states driver
Hector Martin
marcan at marcan.st
Mon Dec 6 21:30:46 PST 2021
On 24/11/2021 16.34, Hector Martin wrote:
> This series adds the driver for the Apple PMGR device power state
> registers. These registers can clockgate and (in some cases) powergate
> specific SoC blocks. They also control the reset line, and can have
> additional features such as automatic power management.
>
> The current driver supports only the lowest/highest power states,
> provided via the genpd framework, plus reset support provided via
> the reset subsystem.
>
> Apple's PMGRs (there are two in the T8103) have a uniform register
> bit layout (sometimes with varying features). To be able to support
> multiple SoC generations as well as express pd relationships
> dynamically, this binding describes each PMGR power state control
> as a single devicetree node. Future SoC generations are expected to
> retain backwards compatibility, allowing this driver to work on them
> with only DT changes.
>
> #1: MAINTAINERS updates, to go via the SoC tree to avert merge hell
> #2-#5: Adds power-domains properties to existing device bindings
> #6-#7: Adds the new pmgr device tree bindings
> #8: The driver itself.
> #9: Instantiates the driver in t8103.dtsi. This adds the entire PMGR
> node tree and references the relevant nodes from existing devices.
> #7: Adds runtime-pm support to the Samsung UART driver, as a first
> working consumer.
> #8: Instantiates a second UART, to more easily test this.
>
> There are currently no consumers for the reset functionality, so
> it is untested, but we will be testing it soon with the NVMe driver
> (as it is required to allow driver re-binding to work properly).
>
> == Changes since v2 ==
> - DT schema review comments & patch order fix
> - Added the power-domains properties to devices that already mainlined
> - Now adds the entire PMGR tree. This turns off all devices we do not
> currently instantiate, and adds power-domains to those we do. The
> nodes were initially generated with [1] and manually tweaked. all
> the labels match the ADT labels (lowercased), which might be used
> by the bootloader in the future to conditionally disable nodes
> based on hardware configuration.
> - Dropped apple,t8103-minipmgr, since I don't expect we will ever need
> to tell apart multiple PMGR instances within a SoC, and added
> apple,t6000-pmgr{-pwrstate} for the new SoCs.
> - Driver now unconditionally enables auto-PM for all devices. This
> seems to be safe and should save power (it is not implemented for
> all devices; if not implemented, the bit just doesn't exist and is
> ignored).
> - If an always-on device is not powered on at boot, turn it on and
> print a warning. This avoids the PM core complaining. We still
> want to know if/when this happens, but let's not outright fail.
> - Other minor fixes (use PS names instead of offsets for messages,
> do not spuriously clear flag bits).
>
> On the way the parent node is handled: I've decided that these syscon
> nodes will only ever contain pwrstates and nothing else. We now size
> them based on the register range that contains pwrstate controls
> (rounded up to page size). t6000 has 3 PMGRs and t6001 has 4, and
> we shouldn't have to care about telling apart the multiple instances.
> Anything else PMGR does that needs a driver will be handled by
> entirely separate nodes in the future.
>
> Re t6001 and t6000 (and the rumored t6002), t6000 is basically a
> cut-down version of t6001 (and t6002 is rumored to be two t6001
> dies), down to the die floorplan, so I'm quite certain we won't need
> t6001/2-specific compatibles for anything shared. The t6000 devicetree
> will just #include the t6001 one and remove the missing devices.
> Hence, everything for this SoC series is going to have compatibles
> named apple,t6000-* (except the extra instances of some blocks in
> t6001 which look like they may have differences; PMGR isn't one of
> them, but some multimedia stuff might).
>
> [1] https://github.com/AsahiLinux/m1n1/blob/main/proxyclient/tools/pmgr_adt2dt.py
>
> Hector Martin (11):
> MAINTAINERS: Add PMGR power state files to ARM/APPLE MACHINE
> dt-bindings: i2c: apple,i2c: Add power-domains property
> dt-bindings: iommu: apple,dart: Add power-domains property
> dt-bindings: pinctrl: apple,pinctrl: Add power-domains property
> dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: apple,aic: Add power-domains
> property
> dt-bindings: power: Add apple,pmgr-pwrstate binding
> dt-bindings: arm: apple: Add apple,pmgr binding
> soc: apple: Add driver for Apple PMGR power state controls
> arm64: dts: apple: t8103: Add PMGR nodes
> tty: serial: samsung_tty: Support runtime PM
> arm64: dts: apple: t8103: Add UART2
>
> .../bindings/arm/apple/apple,pmgr.yaml | 134 ++
> .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/apple,i2c.yaml | 3 +
> .../interrupt-controller/apple,aic.yaml | 3 +
> .../devicetree/bindings/iommu/apple,dart.yaml | 3 +
> .../bindings/pinctrl/apple,pinctrl.yaml | 3 +
> .../bindings/power/apple,pmgr-pwrstate.yaml | 71 ++
> MAINTAINERS | 3 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8103-j274.dts | 5 +
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8103-pmgr.dtsi | 1136 +++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8103.dtsi | 36 +
> drivers/soc/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/soc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/soc/apple/Kconfig | 21 +
> drivers/soc/apple/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/soc/apple/apple-pmgr-pwrstate.c | 317 +++++
> drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c | 93 +-
> 16 files changed, 1798 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/apple/apple,pmgr.yaml
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/apple,pmgr-pwrstate.yaml
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/apple/t8103-pmgr.dtsi
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/apple/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/apple/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/soc/apple/apple-pmgr-pwrstate.c
>
Applied everything except the samsung_tty change to asahi-soc/dt (DT
changes) and asahi-soc/pmgr (just the driver). Thanks everyone for the
reviews!
Krzysztof: feel free to take that patch through tty if you think it's in
good shape. I'm not sure how much power UART runtime-pm will save us,
but at least it's a decent test case, so it's probably worth having.
--
Hector Martin (marcan at marcan.st)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list