[PATCH V4 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: convert Broadcom's WDT to the json-schema

[Rafał Miłecki]

On 06.12.2021 20:43, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 12/6/21 11:37 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 12/6/21 11:13 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> There is simply no rush in getting the bcm7038-wdt driver to support
>>> 4908 *just now*, so why don't you just take the bcm63xx-wdt series that
>>> I posed, and Rafal posts an updated series that adds support for the
>>> 4908 watchdog for the 5.18 cycle?
>>>
>>
>> Your series includes the patch discussed here, and it is the first patch
>> of your series. The second patch in your series depends on it. Are you
>> telling me that I should drop those two patches from your series ?
> 
> No, quite the contrary, I want you to keep the entire 7 patches that
> converted the bcm7038-wdt binding to YAML and get rid of the bcm63xx-wdt
> changes, the branch that you have right now is good in that regard.
> 
> I don't see why you should be creating an immutable branch for Lee and
> not simply merge Rafal's "[PATCH V4 RESEND 2/2] dt-bindings: mfd: add
> Broadcom's Timer-Watchdog block" patch with Lee's ack directly. This is
> a new file, so I don't see how it would create conflicts as long as we
> don't pile up changes on top.

I'd like that pretty much as I wouldn't need to wait few extra months.

Lee: would that be OK for you to simply ack 2/2? So Guenter can pick my
patch without the whole immutable branch & PR thing?