[PATCH v9 00/15] Clean up "mediatek,larb"

[Hans Verkuil]

On 06/12/2021 12:52, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 06:54:54PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
>> Yong Wu (14):
>>   dt-binding: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek, larb for multimedia HW
>>   iommu/mediatek-v1: Free the existed fwspec if the master dev already
>>     has
>>   iommu/mediatek: Return ENODEV if the device is NULL
>>   iommu/mediatek: Add probe_defer for smi-larb
>>   iommu/mediatek: Add device_link between the consumer and the larb
>>     devices
>>   media: mtk-jpeg: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put
>>   media: mtk-mdp: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put
>>   drm/mediatek: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put
>>   media: mtk-vcodec: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put
>>   media: mtk-vcodec: dec: Remove mtk_vcodec_release_dec_pm
>>   media: mtk-vcodec: enc: Remove mtk_vcodec_release_enc_pm
>>   memory: mtk-smi: Get rid of mtk_smi_larb_get/put
>>   arm: dts: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek, larb for MM nodes
>>   arm64: dts: mediatek: Get rid of mediatek, larb for MM nodes
>>
>> Yongqiang Niu (1):
>>   drm/mediatek: Add pm runtime support for ovl and rdma
> 
> What is the plan for merging this? If Matthias has no objections I can
> take the iommu-parts, or will this go through another tree?

I think it might be easiest if it is all going through the media subsystem
(except for the dts patches, we don't handle those unless specifically
requested to do so). I need a resend for jpeg bindings txt to yaml
conversion series first, though. This time with the linux-media mailinglist
included :-)

I would need your Ack for the iommu patches as well, of course.

Regards,

	Hans