[PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci-iproc: "mmc1: Internal clock never stabilised." seen on 72113
Adrian Hunter
adrian.hunter at intel.com
Thu Dec 2 23:59:12 PST 2021
On 02/12/2021 18:30, Al Cooper wrote:
> The problem is in the .shutdown callback that was added to the
> sdhci-iproc and sdhci-brcmstb drivers to save power in S5. The
> shutdown callback will just call the sdhci_pltfm_suspend() function
> to suspend the lower level driver and then stop the sdhci system
> clock. The problem is that in some cases there can be a worker
> thread in the "system_freezable_wq" work queue that is scanning
> for a device every second. In normal system suspend, this queue
> is suspended before the driver suspend is called. In shutdown the
> queue is not suspended and the thread my run after we stop the
> sdhci clock in the shutdown callback which will cause the "clock
> never stabilised" error. The solution will be to have the shutdown
> callback cancel the worker thread before calling suspend (and
> stopping the sdhci clock).
>
> NOTE: This is only happening on systems with the Legacy RPi SDIO
> core because that's the only controller that doesn't have the
> presence signal and needs to use a worker thread to do a 1 second
> poll loop.
>
> Fixes: 98b5ce4c08ca ("mmc: sdhci-iproc: Add support for the legacy sdhci controller on the BCM7211")
> Signed-off-by: Al Cooper <alcooperx at gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-iproc.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-iproc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-iproc.c
> index 032bf852397f..05db768edcfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-iproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-iproc.c
> @@ -428,6 +428,10 @@ static int sdhci_iproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> static void sdhci_iproc_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> + struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + /* Cancel possible rescan worker thread */
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&host->mmc->detect);
> sdhci_pltfm_suspend(&pdev->dev);
> }
>
>
> base-commit: 58e1100fdc5990b0cc0d4beaf2562a92e621ac7d
>
I wonder if mmc core should handle this instead. e.g.
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
index 240c5af793dc..55c509442659 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -2264,15 +2264,21 @@ void mmc_start_host(struct mmc_host *host)
_mmc_detect_change(host, 0, false);
}
-void mmc_stop_host(struct mmc_host *host)
+void mmc_quiesce_host(struct mmc_host *host)
{
- if (host->slot.cd_irq >= 0) {
+ if (host->slot.cd_irq >= 0 && host->slot.irq_enabled) {
mmc_gpio_set_cd_wake(host, false);
disable_irq(host->slot.cd_irq);
+ host->slot.irq_enabled = false;
}
host->rescan_disable = 1;
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&host->detect);
+}
+
+void mmc_stop_host(struct mmc_host *host)
+{
+ mmc_quiesce_host(host);
/* clear pm flags now and let card drivers set them as needed */
host->pm_flags = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.h b/drivers/mmc/core/core.h
index 7931a4f0137d..dcee28eec9a6 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.h
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.h
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ static inline void mmc_delay(unsigned int ms)
void mmc_rescan(struct work_struct *work);
void mmc_start_host(struct mmc_host *host);
void mmc_stop_host(struct mmc_host *host);
+void mmc_quiesce_host(struct mmc_host *host);
void _mmc_detect_change(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned long delay,
bool cd_irq);
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
index d4683b1d263f..5b272f938558 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/host.c
@@ -80,9 +80,18 @@ static void mmc_host_classdev_release(struct device *dev)
kfree(host);
}
+static int mmc_host_shutdown_pre(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct mmc_host *host = cls_dev_to_mmc_host(dev);
+
+ mmc_quiesce_host(host);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static struct class mmc_host_class = {
.name = "mmc_host",
.dev_release = mmc_host_classdev_release,
+ .shutdown_pre = mmc_host_shutdown_pre,
.pm = MMC_HOST_CLASS_DEV_PM_OPS,
};
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c
index dd2a4b6ab6ad..4967f0b15806 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c
@@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ void mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq(struct mmc_host *host)
ctx->cd_label, host);
if (ret < 0)
irq = ret;
+ else
+ host->slot.irq_enabled = true;
}
host->slot.cd_irq = irq;
diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
index 7afb57cab00b..d1fd9b05274b 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
@@ -263,6 +263,7 @@ struct mmc_async_req {
struct mmc_slot {
int cd_irq;
bool cd_wake_enabled;
+ bool irq_enabled;
void *handler_priv;
};
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list