[PATCH v5, 13/15] dt-bindings: media: mtk-vcodec: Adds decoder dt-bindings for mt8192

Ezequiel Garcia ezequiel at vanguardiasur.com.ar
Sun Aug 29 13:50:31 PDT 2021


On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 14:59, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Yunfei,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:57:59AM +0800, Yunfei Dong wrote:
> > Adds decoder dt-bindings for mt8192.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong at mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > v5: no changes
> >
> > This patch depends on "Mediatek MT8192 clock support"[1].
> >
> > The definition of decoder clocks are in mt8192-clk.h, need to include them in case of build fail [1].
> >
> > [1]https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=511175
> > ---
> >  .../media/mediatek,vcodec-comp-decoder.yaml   | 172 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 172 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec-comp-decoder.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec-comp-decoder.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec-comp-decoder.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..083c89933917
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,vcodec-comp-decoder.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iommu/mediatek,vcodec-comp-decoder.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Mediatek Video Decode Accelerator With Component
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong at mediatek.com>
> > +
> > +description: |+
> > +  Mediatek Video Decode is the video decode hardware present in Mediatek
> > +  SoCs which supports high resolution decoding functionalities. Required
> > +  master and component node.
>
> This should explain how the three IP cores relate to each other.
>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    oneOf:
> > +      - enum:
> > +          - mediatek,mt8192-vcodec-dec  # for lat hardware
> > +          - mediatek,mtk-vcodec-lat     # for core hardware
> > +          - mediatek,mtk-vcodec-core
> > +
> > +  reg:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  interrupts:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  clocks:
> > +    maxItems: 5
> > +
> > +  clock-names:
> > +    items:
> > +      - const: vdec-sel
> > +      - const: vdec-soc-vdec
> > +      - const: vdec-soc-lat
> > +      - const: vdec-vdec
> > +      - const: vdec-top
> > +
> > +  assigned-clocks: true
> > +
> > +  assigned-clock-parents: true
> > +
> > +  power-domains:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  iommus:
> > +    minItems: 1
> > +    maxItems: 32
> > +    description: |
> > +      List of the hardware port in respective IOMMU block for current Socs.
> > +      Refer to bindings/iommu/mediatek,iommu.yaml.
> > +
> > +  dma-ranges:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +    description: |
> > +      Describes the physical address space of IOMMU maps to memory.
> > +
> > +  mediatek,scp:
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +    description:
> > +      Describes point to scp.
> > +
> > +required:
> > +      - compatible
> > +      - reg
> > +      - iommus
> > +      - dma-ranges
> > +
> > +allOf:
> > +  - if: #master node
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          contains:
> > +            enum:
> > +              - mediatek,mt8192-vcodec-dec  # for lat hardware
> > +
> > +    then:
> > +      required:
> > +        - mediatek,scp
> > +
> > +  - if: #component node
> > +      properties:
> > +        compatible:
> > +          contains:
> > +            enum:
> > +              - mediatek,mtk-vcodec-lat     # for core hardware
> > +              - mediatek,mtk-vcodec-core
> > +
> > +    then:
> > +      required:
> > +        - interrupts
> > +        - clocks
> > +        - clock-names
> > +        - assigned-clocks
> > +        - assigned-clock-parents
> > +        - power-domains
> > +
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +examples:
> > +  - |
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/memory/mt8192-larb-port.h>
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt8192-clk.h>
> > +    #include <dt-bindings/power/mt8192-power.h>
> > +
> > +    vcodec_dec: vcodec_dec at 16000000 {
> > +        compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-vcodec-dec";
> > +        reg = <0 0x16000000 0 0x1000>;               /* VDEC_SYS */
> > +        mediatek,scp = <&scp>;
> > +        iommus = <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_MC_EXT>;
> > +        dma-ranges = <0x1 0x0 0x0 0x40000000 0x0 0xfff00000>;
> > +    };
> > +
> > +    vcodec_lat: vcodec_lat at 0x16010000 {
> > +        compatible = "mediatek,mtk-vcodec-lat";
> > +        reg = <0 0x16010000 0 0x800>;                /* VDEC_MISC */
> > +        interrupts = <GIC_SPI 426 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> > +        iommus = <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_VLD_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_VLD2_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_AVC_MV_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_PRED_RD_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_TILE_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_WDMA_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_LAT0_RG_CTRL_DMA_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L5_VDEC_UFO_ENC_EXT>;
> > +        dma-ranges = <0x1 0x0 0x0 0x40000000 0x0 0xfff00000>;
> > +        clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VDEC_SEL>,
> > +             <&vdecsys_soc CLK_VDEC_SOC_VDEC>,
> > +             <&vdecsys_soc CLK_VDEC_SOC_LAT>,
> > +             <&vdecsys_soc CLK_VDEC_SOC_LARB1>,
> > +             <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MAINPLL_D4>;
> > +        clock-names = "vdec-sel", "vdec-soc-vdec", "vdec-soc-lat",
> > +              "vdec-vdec", "vdec-top";
> > +        assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VDEC_SEL>;
> > +        assigned-clock-parents = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MAINPLL_D4>;
> > +        power-domains = <&spm MT8192_POWER_DOMAIN_VDEC>;
> > +    };
> > +
> > +    vcodec_core: vcodec_core at 0x16025000 {
> > +        compatible = "mediatek,mtk-vcodec-core";
> > +        reg = <0 0x16025000 0 0x1000>;               /* VDEC_CORE_MISC */
> > +        interrupts = <GIC_SPI 425 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> > +        iommus = <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_MC_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_UFO_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_PP_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_PRED_RD_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_PRED_WR_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_PPWRAP_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_TILE_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_VLD_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_VLD2_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_AVC_MV_EXT>,
> > +             <&iommu0 M4U_PORT_L4_VDEC_RG_CTRL_DMA_EXT>;
> > +        dma-ranges = <0x1 0x0 0x0 0x40000000 0x0 0xfff00000>;
> > +        clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VDEC_SEL>,
> > +             <&vdecsys CLK_VDEC_VDEC>,
> > +             <&vdecsys CLK_VDEC_LAT>,
> > +             <&vdecsys CLK_VDEC_LARB1>,
> > +             <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MAINPLL_D4>;
> > +        clock-names = "vdec-sel", "vdec-soc-vdec", "vdec-soc-lat",
> > +              "vdec-vdec", "vdec-top";
> > +        assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_VDEC_SEL>;
> > +        assigned-clock-parents = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_MAINPLL_D4>;
> > +        power-domains = <&spm MT8192_POWER_DOMAIN_VDEC2>;
> > +    };
>
> I'm a bit late in the game, reviewing v5 only, but I'm wondering if
> those IP cores need to be modelled in separate nodes. It would be much
> easier, from a software point of view, to have a single node, with
> multiple register ranges.
>
> Are some of those IP cores used in different SoCs, combined in different
> ways, that make a modular design better ?
>

Yeah, I agree with Laurent here. This way of modelling the different parts
of the CODEC as different pieces is the reason why you need a framework
to pull them together, such as the component API (I guess v4l2-async
could have been used as well).

I normally don't bother with driver internals, as its up to each driver
author to decide what is best. However, I believe this design is too
convoluted, and it may lead other developers to follow the same pattern,
so please avoid it.

There are several ways of modelling this and initializing or probing
the sub-devices,
without using any async framework.

Thanks,
Ezequiel



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list