[PATCH v7 3/4] dt-bindings: pwm: add IPQ6018 binding

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 05:59:45PM +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 25 2021, Rob Herring wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:48:26 +0300, Baruch Siach wrote:
> >> DT binding for the PWM block in Qualcomm IPQ6018 SoC.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il>
> >> ---
> >> v7:
> >> 
> >>   Use 'reg' instead of 'offset' (Rob)
> >> 
> >>   Drop 'clock-names' and 'assigned-clock*' (Bjorn)
> >> 
> >>   Use single cell address/size in example node (Bjorn)
> >> 
> >>   Move '#pwm-cells' lower in example node (Bjorn)
> >> 
> >>   List 'reg' as required
> >> 
> >> v6:
> >> 
> >>   Device node is child of TCSR; remove phandle (Rob Herring)
> >> 
> >>   Add assigned-clocks/assigned-clock-rates (Uwe Kleine-König)
> >> 
> >> v5: Use qcom,pwm-regs for phandle instead of direct regs (Bjorn
> >>     Andersson, Kathiravan T)
> >> 
> >> v4: Update the binding example node as well (Rob Herring's bot)
> >> 
> >> v3: s/qcom,pwm-ipq6018/qcom,ipq6018-pwm/ (Rob Herring)
> >> 
> >> v2: Make #pwm-cells const (Rob Herring)
> >> ---
> >>  .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml      | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
> >>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.yaml
> >
> > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> >
> > yamllint warnings/errors:
> >
> > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ipq-pwm.example.dt.yaml:0:0:
> > /example-0/syscon at 1937000: failed to match any schema with compatible:
> > ['qcom,tcsr-ipq6018', 'syscon', 'simple-mfd']
> 
> What can I do about that? Is it because qcom,tcsr-ipq6018 is documented
> in a non-yaml plain .txt file?

No, it is not documented at all.

Rob