[PATCH] dt-bindings: mmc: fsl-imx-esdhc: change the pinctrl-names rule
Bough Chen
haibo.chen at nxp.com
Wed Aug 18 20:30:33 PDT 2021
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring [mailto:robh at kernel.org]
> Sent: 2021年8月19日 2:33
> To: Bough Chen <haibo.chen at nxp.com>
> Cc: shawnguo at kernel.org; s.hauer at pengutronix.de; ulf.hansson at linaro.org;
> kernel at pengutronix.de; festevam at gmail.com; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-imx at nxp.com>; Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong at nxp.com>;
> devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
> linux-mmc at vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mmc: fsl-imx-esdhc: change the
> pinctrl-names rule
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 05:46:24PM +0800, haibo.chen at nxp.com wrote:
> > From: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen at nxp.com>
> >
> > Change the pinctrl-names rule to cover all cases.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen at nxp.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml | 21 +++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> > index 17086f60f8a3..d324606a4f0a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/fsl-imx-esdhc.yaml
> > @@ -116,12 +116,21 @@ properties:
> > - const: per
> >
> > pinctrl-names:
> > - minItems: 1
> > - items:
> > - - const: default
> > - - const: state_100mhz
> > - - const: state_200mhz
> > - - const: sleep
> > + oneOf:
> > + - items:
> > + - const: default
> > + - const: state_100mhz
> > + - const: state_200mhz
> > + - const: sleep
> > + - items:
> > + - const: default
> > + - const: state_100mhz
> > + - const: state_200mhz
>
> You can drop this one and add 'minItems: 3' to the first case.
Okay, I will do that.
>
> > + - items:
> > + - const: default
> > + - const: sleep
> > + - items:
> > + - const: default
>
> Similar here too with the prior case. Or use 'minItems: 1' in the first case. That
> additional allows the 2 entry case, but why isn't that valid?
> Couldn't a board only support default+state_100mhz?
Logically not, for board, if support SD3.0 mode, this means it support both SDR104/SDR50/DDR50/HS200/HS400
State_100mhz is used for SDR50 and DDR50, state_200mhz is used for SDR104/HS200/HS400.
So, if there is state_100mhz, there should be state_200mhz.
Rest Regards
Haibo Chen
>
> Rob
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list