[PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: Drop direct PAGE_[SHIFT|SIZE] usage as page size

Marc Zyngier maz at kernel.org
Tue Aug 10 06:33:17 PDT 2021


On 2021-08-10 08:02, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> All instances here could just directly test against 
> CONFIG_ARM64_XXK_PAGES
> instead of evaluating via PAGE_SHIFT or PAGE_SIZE. With this change, 
> there
> will be no such usage left.
> 
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
> Cc: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei at arm.com>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose at arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: kvmarm at lists.cs.columbia.edu
> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual at arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 6 +++---
>  arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c          | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c 
> b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> index 05321f4165e3..a6112b6d6ef6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static bool kvm_level_supports_block_mapping(u32 
> level)
>  	 * Reject invalid block mappings and don't bother with 4TB mappings 
> for
>  	 * 52-bit PAs.
>  	 */
> -	return !(level == 0 || (PAGE_SIZE != SZ_4K && level == 1));
> +	return !(level == 0 || (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES) && level 
> == 1));
>  }
> 
>  static bool kvm_block_mapping_supported(u64 addr, u64 end, u64 phys, 
> u32 level)
> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static u64 kvm_pte_to_phys(kvm_pte_t pte)
>  {
>  	u64 pa = pte & KVM_PTE_ADDR_MASK;
> 
> -	if (PAGE_SHIFT == 16)
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES))
>  		pa |= FIELD_GET(KVM_PTE_ADDR_51_48, pte) << 48;
> 
>  	return pa;
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static kvm_pte_t kvm_phys_to_pte(u64 pa)
>  {
>  	kvm_pte_t pte = pa & KVM_PTE_ADDR_MASK;
> 
> -	if (PAGE_SHIFT == 16)
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES))
>  		pte |= FIELD_PREP(KVM_PTE_ADDR_51_48, pa >> 48);
> 
>  	return pte;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 9ff0de1b2b93..8fdfca179815 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ static void alloc_init_cont_pmd(pud_t *pudp,
> unsigned long addr,
>  static inline bool use_1G_block(unsigned long addr, unsigned long 
> next,
>  			unsigned long phys)
>  {
> -	if (PAGE_SHIFT != 12)
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_4K_PAGES))
>  		return false;
> 
>  	if (((addr | next | phys) & ~PUD_MASK) != 0)

I personally find it a lot less readable.

Also, there is no evaluation whatsoever. All the code guarded
by a PAGE_SIZE/PAGE_SHIFT that doesn't match the configuration
is dropped at compile time.

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list