[PATCH 8/8] cpufreq: vexpress: Use auto-registration for energy model
Lukasz Luba
lukasz.luba at arm.com
Tue Aug 10 03:11:31 PDT 2021
On 8/10/21 11:06 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 10-08-21, 11:05, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> I can see that this driver calls explicitly the
>> of_cpufreq_cooling_register()
>> It does this in the cpufreq_driver->ready() callback
>> implementation: ve_spc_cpufreq_ready()
>>
>> With that in mind, the new code in the patch 1/8, which
>> registers the EM, should be called even earlier, above:
>> ---------------------8<---------------------------------
>> /* Callback for handling stuff after policy is ready */
>> if (cpufreq_driver->ready)
>> cpufreq_driver->ready(policy);
>> ------------------->8----------------------------------
>
> Thanks. I will look at this sequencing issue again.
>
>> This also triggered a question:
>> If this new flag can be set in the cpufreq driver which hasn't set
>> CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV
>> ?
>
> Why not ?
I thought someone could try to call cpufreq_cooling_register()
from the cpufreq driver init function, but it's not possible. I have
just checked that, so should be good with these two flags being
independent and working fine.
>
>> I can only see one driver (this one in the patch) which has such
>> configuration.
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list