[PATCH v2 4/6] usb: dwc3: reference clock period configuration
Thinh Nguyen
Thinh.Nguyen at synopsys.com
Mon Aug 9 15:13:13 PDT 2021
Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il> writes:
>> Hi Felipe,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 04 2021, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> Baruch Siach <baruch at tkos.co.il> writes:
>>>> @@ -1371,6 +1398,8 @@ static void dwc3_get_properties(struct dwc3 *dwc)
>>>> &dwc->hsphy_interface);
>>>> device_property_read_u32(dev, "snps,quirk-frame-length-adjustment",
>>>> &dwc->fladj);
>>>> + device_property_read_u32(dev, "snps,ref-clock-period",
>>>> + &dwc->ref_clk_per);
>>>
>>> I wonder if it would make more sense to pass an actual clock reference
>>> here. If valid, then reconfigure the period to the value returned by
>>> clk_get_rate(). It would avoid yet another DT binding. If we make the
>>> clock optional, then we won't affect any other platforms. The clock
>>> itself could be a regular fixed clock node.
>>
>> Thinh Nguyen asked to add a dedicated DT property. He explained that
>> clk_get_rate() does not work for PCI hosted dwc3. This is the most
>> complete summary of the discussion:
>
> Hence the "optional" :-)
>
> Or, perhaps, Thinh wants to use this for internal FPGA-based validation?
>
> In that case, I'm okay with the property.
>
We do use it for internal FPGA validation, but it should help for other
dwc3 PCI devices also.
BR,
Thinh
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list