[PATCH] ARM: ep93xx: remove MaverickCrunch support

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 1:41 PM Martin Guy <martinwguy at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I forward opinion from people currently producing and supporting EP93XX boards:

Thanks a lot for bringing them in. I definitely don't want to remove support for
something that is actively being used, and we don't have to merge the patch
if they currently rely on MaverickCrunch on older platforms.

It does sound however like Jerome's customers are using a normal (softfloat)
Linus distro on EP93xx, rather than one using the original MaverickCrunch
FPU instructions. There are no plans to discontinue EP93xx support, there
is actually a good amount of recent work going into updating the platform.

Jerome, please let me know if I understood you correctly here. If your
customers do rely on MaverickCrunch support in user space, I would
leave that in the kernel for as long as ep93xx itself is supported, and instead
require building support with the GNU assembler to avoid having to
add support to the clang integrated assembler. If you don't know of anyone
using MaverickCrunch, I would go ahead with my patch to remove kernel
support.

      Arnd

> From: Technologic Systems Support Team <support at embeddedarm.com>
> To: martinwguy at gmail.com
> Cc: jerome.oufella at savoirfairelinux.com
>
> > I expect our customers would care if support was dropped.
> > Unfortunately I don't know to what extent.  I'd like to bring
> > Jerome Oufella of Savoir Faire Linux into the conversation here,
> > as he runs the software company who most of our customers
> > contract through when they need a modern Linux kernel running
> > on one of our Cirrus Logic EP93XX series single board computers.
> > I expect his opinion will be more valuable than mine.
> >
> > Good morning Jerome,
> >
> > A member of the Linux Kernel Development community reached out
> > to us this morning letting us know the community has suggested
> > dropping support for the MavericCrunch FPU on the EP9302 processor.
> > Would this impact any of the development your team has been doing
> > for some of our mutual customers?
>
> From: Jerome Oufella<jerome.oufella at savoirfairelinux.com>
> > I am aware of a few companies who rely on variants of the TS-7250
> > running not-too-old LTS releases (4.19, 5.4) to cope with their patch policies.
> >
> > With Linux 5.10 being the next "Super LTS", this presumably brings its
> > support lifespan until about 2030, which (I believe) they would be
> > comfortable with considering the age of the platform.
> >
> > Jerome Oufella
> > Vice-President, Technologies
> > www.savoirfairelinux.com