[PATCH V8 1/8] PM / devfreq: Add cpu based scaling support to passive_governor

[andrew-sh.cheng]

On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 11:47 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 4/1/21 9:16 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> > On 3/31/21 10:03 PM, andrew-sh.cheng wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2021-03-31 at 17:35 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> >>> On 3/31/21 5:27 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> On 3/31/21 5:03 PM, andrew-sh.cheng wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 2021-03-25 at 17:14 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> You are missing to add these patches to linux-pm mailing list.
> >>>>>> Need to send them to linu-pm ML.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Also, before received this series, I tried to clean-up these patches
> >>>>>> on testing branch[1]. So that I add my comment with my clean-up case.
> >>>>>> [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!zIrzeDp9vPnm1_SDzVPuzqdHn3zWie9DnfBXaA-j9-CSrVc6aR9_rJQQiw81_CgAPh9XRRs$ 
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And 'Saravana Kannan <skannan at codeaurora.org>' is wrong email address.
> >>>>>> Please update the email or drop this email.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi Chanwoo,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thank you for the advices.
> >>>>> I will resend patch v9 (add to linux-pm ML), remove this patch, and note
> >>>>> that my patch set base on
> >>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yUlsuxrL5PcbF7o6A9DlCfvoA6w8V8VXKjYIybYyiJg3D0HM-lI2xRuxLUV6b3UJ8WFhg_g$ 
> >>>>
> >>>> I has not yet test this patch[1] on devfreq-testing-passive-gov branch.
> >>>> So that if possible, I'd like you to test your patches with this patch[1] 
> >>>> and then if there is no problem, could you send the next patches with patch[1]?
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/commit/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov&id=39c80d11a8f42dd63ecea1e0df595a0ceb83b454__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yUlsuxrL5PcbF7o6A9DlCfvoA6w8V8VXKjYIybYyiJg3D0HM-lI2xRuxLUV6b3UJR2cQqZs$ 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for the confusion. I make the devfreq-testing-passive-gov[1]
> >>> branch based on latest devfreq-next branch.
> >>> [1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-testing-passive-gov__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!yUlsuxrL5PcbF7o6A9DlCfvoA6w8V8VXKjYIybYyiJg3D0HM-lI2xRuxLUV6b3UJ8WFhg_g$ 
> >>>
> >>> First of all, if possible, I want to test them[1] with your patches in this series.
> >>> And then if there are no any problem, please let me know. After confirmed from you,
> >>> I'll send the patches of devfreq-testing-passive-gov[1] branch.
> >>> How about that?
> >>>
> >> Hi Chanwoo~
> >>
> >> We will use this on Google Chrome project.
> >> Google Hsin-Yi has test your patch + my patch set v8 [2~8]
> >>
> >>     make sure cci devfreqs runs with cpufreq.
> >>     suspend resume
> >>     speedometer2 benchmark
> >> It is okay.
> >>
> >> Please send the patches of devfreq-testing-passive-gov[1] branch.
> >>
> >> I will send patch v9 base on yours latter.
> > 
> > Thanks for your test. I'll send the patches today.
> 
> I'm sorry for delay because when I tested the patches
> for devfreq parent type on Odroid-xu3, there are some problem
> related to lazy linking of OPP. So I'm trying to analyze them.
> Unfortunately, we need to postpone these patches to next linux
> version.
> 
> 
Hi Chanwoo,
Sorry to bother you.
Do you work on this patch now?
Is there any thing that we can do?


> [snip]
>