[PATCH 12/13] ARM: dts: stm32: fix DSI port node on STM32MP15
Alexandre TORGUE
alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com
Thu Apr 15 13:23:32 BST 2021
Hi Ahmad
On 4/15/21 12:43 PM, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15.04.21 12:10, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>> Running "make dtbs_check W=1", some warnings are reported concerning
>> DSI. This patch reorder DSI nodes to avoid:
>>
>> soc/dsi at 5a000000: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without
>> "ranges" or child "reg" property
>
> This reverts parts of commit 9c32f980d9 ("ARM: dts: stm32: preset
> stm32mp15x video #address- and #size-cells"):
>
> The cell count for address and size is defined by the binding and not
> something a board would change. Avoid each board adding this
> boilerplate by having the cell size specification in the SoC DTSI.
>
>
> The DSI can have child nodes with a unit address (e.g. a panel) and ones
> without (ports { } container). ports is described in the dtsi, panels are
> described in the dts if available.
>
> Apparently, the checker is fine with
> ports {
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
> };
>
> I think my rationale for the patch above was sound, so I think the checker
> taking offense at the DSI cells here should be considered a false positive.
If it's a "false positive" warning then we need to find a way to not
print it out. Else, it'll be difficult to distinguish which warnings are
"normal" and which are not. This question could also be applied to patch[3].
Arnd, Rob what is your feeling about this case ?
thanks
alex
> Thanks,
> Ahmad
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157.dtsi
>> index 54e73ccea446..c355fcf26ec3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157.dtsi
>> @@ -24,8 +24,6 @@
>> clock-names = "pclk", "ref", "px_clk";
>> resets = <&rcc DSI_R>;
>> reset-names = "apb";
>> - #address-cells = <1>;
>> - #size-cells = <0>;
>> status = "disabled";
>>
>> ports {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-dk2.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-dk2.dts
>> index 19ef475a48fc..763dde1dbbaf 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-dk2.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-dk2.dts
>> @@ -36,6 +36,8 @@
>> &dsi {
>> status = "okay";
>> phy-dsi-supply = <®18>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>
>> ports {
>> port at 0 {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
>> index 6fe5b0fee7c4..4625bb58cc6d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts
>> @@ -102,6 +102,8 @@
>> &dsi {
>> phy-dsi-supply = <®18>;
>> status = "okay";
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>
>> ports {
>> port at 0 {
>>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list