[PATCH v13 03/18] arm64: hyp-stub: Move el1_sync into the vectors
Marc Zyngier
maz at kernel.org
Thu Apr 8 16:01:40 BST 2021
On Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:45:18 +0100,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin at soleen.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 6:24 AM Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-04-08 05:05, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > > From: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
> > >
> > > The hyp-stub's el1_sync code doesn't do very much, this can easily fit
> > > in the vectors.
> > >
> > > With this, all of the hyp-stubs behaviour is contained in its vectors.
> > > This lets kexec and hibernate copy the hyp-stub when they need its
> > > behaviour, instead of re-implementing it.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
> > >
> > > [Fixed merging issues]
> >
> > That's a pretty odd fix IMO.
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin at soleen.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S | 59 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
> > > b/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
> > > index ff329c5c074d..d1a73d0f74e0 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hyp-stub.S
> > > @@ -21,6 +21,34 @@ SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(\label)
> > > .align 7
> > > b \label
> > > SYM_CODE_END(\label)
> > > +.endm
> > > +
> > > +.macro hyp_stub_el1_sync
> > > +SYM_CODE_START_LOCAL(hyp_stub_el1_sync)
> > > + .align 7
> > > + cmp x0, #HVC_SET_VECTORS
> > > + b.ne 2f
> > > + msr vbar_el2, x1
> > > + b 9f
> > > +
> > > +2: cmp x0, #HVC_SOFT_RESTART
> > > + b.ne 3f
> > > + mov x0, x2
> > > + mov x2, x4
> > > + mov x4, x1
> > > + mov x1, x3
> > > + br x4 // no return
> > > +
> > > +3: cmp x0, #HVC_RESET_VECTORS
> > > + beq 9f // Nothing to reset!
> > > +
> > > + /* Someone called kvm_call_hyp() against the hyp-stub... */
> > > + mov_q x0, HVC_STUB_ERR
> > > + eret
> > > +
> > > +9: mov x0, xzr
> > > + eret
> > > +SYM_CODE_END(hyp_stub_el1_sync)
> >
> > You said you tested this on a TX2. I guess you don't care whether
> > it runs VHE or not...
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> Thank you for noticing this. Not sure how this missmerge happened. I
> have added the missing case, and VHE is initialized correctly during
> boot.
> [ 14.698175] kvm [1]: VHE mode initialized successfully
>
> During normal boot, kexec reboot, and kdump reboot. I will respin the
> series and send the version 14 soon.
Please give people a chance to review this lot first. This isn't code
that is easy to digest, and immediate re-spinning does more harm than
good (this isn't targeting 5.13, I would assume).
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list