[PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: serial: 8250: deprecate aspeed,sirq-polarity-sense
Zev Weiss
zev at bewilderbeest.net
Wed Apr 7 18:55:29 BST 2021
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 12:25:09PM CDT, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 11:56:04AM -0500, Zev Weiss wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 10:18:31AM CDT, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 01:27:21PM -0500, Zev Weiss wrote:
>> > > This property ties SIRQ polarity to SCU register bits that don't
>> > > necessarily have any direct relationship to it; the only use of it
>> > > was removed in commit c82bf6e133d30e0f9172a20807814fa28aef0f67.
>> >
>> > Please write that as:
>> > c82bf6e133d3 ("ARM: aspeed: g5: Do not set sirq polarity")
>> >
>>
>> Ack, will do.
>>
>> > > Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zev at bewilderbeest.net>
>> > > Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel at jms.id.au>
>> > > ---
>> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.yaml | 1 +
>> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >
>> > What changed from previous versions? That always goes below the ---
>> > line.
>> >
>>
>> I included an overview of that in the cover letter (https://lore.kernel.org/openbmc/20210402182724.20848-1-zev@bewilderbeest.net/);
>> is it desirable to also have that duplicated in the individual patches in
>> the series?
>
>Any reason why you didn't include all of the relevant people and mailing
>lists in that cover letter? I've never seen it before :)
>
Ah -- is there a good rule of thumb (or git send-email trick) for that?
Set-union of get_maintainer.pl over all the patches in the series?
Zev
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list