[PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: arm: add compatible strings for Forlinx OKA40i-C

[Ivan Uvarov]

On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 11:40:01 +0200
Maxime Ripard <maxime at cerno.tech> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 06:56:15PM +0300, Ivan Uvarov wrote:
> > The OKA40i-C is a carrier/development board for the Forlinx
> > FETA40i-C SoM based on the Allwinner R40/A40i SoC.
> > 
> > This patch adds the relevant dt-binding documentation in
> > preparation for the next patch, which adds a devicetree for the SoM
> > and board.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ivan Uvarov <i.uvarov at cognitivepilot.com>
> > 
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml index
> > 08607c7ec1..74f8decd78 100644 ---
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml +++
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml @@ -224,6
> > +224,12 @@ properties:
> >            - const: empire-electronix,m712
> >            - const: allwinner,sun5i-a13
> >  
> > +      - description: Forlinx OKA40i-C Development board
> > +        items:
> > +          - const: forlinx,oka40i-c
> > +          - const: forlinx,feta40i-c
> > +          - const: allwinner,sun8i-r40
> > +
> >        - description: FriendlyARM NanoPi A64
> >          items:
> >            - const: friendlyarm,nanopi-a64
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml index
> > f6064d84a4..e2ea1a731e 100644 ---
> > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml +++
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml @@ -403,6
> > +403,8 @@ patternProperties: description: Firefly
> >    "^focaltech,.*":
> >      description: FocalTech Systems Co.,Ltd
> > +  "^forlinx,.*":
> > +    description: Baoding Forlinx Embedded Technology Co., Ltd.
> >    "^frida,.*":
> >      description: Shenzhen Frida LCD Co., Ltd.
> >    "^friendlyarm,.*":
> > -- 
> > 2.25.1  
> 
> This part needs to be in a separate patch too
> 
> Maxime
> 

As in, a separate patch for just the vendor prefix?

--
Regards,
Ivan Uvarov