[RFC PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Detect FTRACE cases that make the stack trace unreliable
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Thu Apr 1 15:27:59 BST 2021
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 02:09:54PM -0500, madvenka at linux.microsoft.com wrote:
> + * FTRACE trampolines.
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
> + { (unsigned long) &ftrace_graph_call, 0 },
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> + { (unsigned long) ftrace_graph_caller, 0 },
> + { (unsigned long) return_to_handler, 0 },
> +#endif
> +#endif
It's weird that we take the address of ftrace_graph_call but not the
other functions - we should be consistent or explain why. It'd probably
also look nicer to not nest the ifdefs, the dependencies in Kconfig will
ensure we only get things when we should.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20210401/372d547f/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list