[PATCH v7 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW

Hector Yuan hector.yuan at mediatek.com
Fri Sep 25 03:25:48 EDT 2020


Hi, Rob sir:

Yes, my patch follows
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt way to
define frequency domain.
Is it OK to you if I use the same way to do?
And if there exist any schema problem, please kindly let me know how to
fix it.

My patch reference
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-cooling-devices.yaml
to use the cpu node.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.9-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-cooling-devices.yaml

Thanks a lot.

On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 11:45 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 25-09-20, 10:27, Hector Yuan wrote:
> > Hi, Viresh & Rob Sir:
> > 
> > I will change frequency domain to below and define it in cpufreq_hw
> > schema rather than cpu node.
> > 
> > mediatek,freq-domain-0 = <&cpu0>, <&cpu1>;
> 
> I think it would be better to do it the standard way we have done it elsewhere.
> i.e. follow Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt, that
> is similar to what you did earlier.
> 



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list