[PATCH v2] arm64: dts: zynqmp-zcu100-revC: correct interrupt flags

[Michal Simek]

On 17. 09. 20 20:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> GPIO_ACTIVE_x flags are not correct in the context of interrupt flags.
> These are simple defines so they could be used in DTS but they will not
> have the same meaning:
> 1. GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH = 0 = IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> 2. GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW  = 1 = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING
> 
> Correct the interrupt flags, assuming the author of the code wanted same
> logical behavior behind the name "ACTIVE_xxx", this is:
>   ACTIVE_LOW => IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> Not tested on HW.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Correct title
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu100-revC.dts | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu100-revC.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu100-revC.dts
> index d60110ad8367..c9460693f4e9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu100-revC.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-zcu100-revC.dts
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@
>  				compatible = "ti,tps65086";
>  				reg = <0x5e>;
>  				interrupt-parent = <&gpio>;
> -				interrupts = <77 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> +				interrupts = <77 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>  				#gpio-cells = <2>;
>  				gpio-controller;
>  			};
> 

Applied to https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/tree/zynqmp/dt.
M