[PATCH v6 1/4] KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework
Jarkko Sakkinen
jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com
Thu Sep 17 12:21:42 EDT 2020
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 07:16:35PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> Current trusted keys framework is tightly coupled to use TPM device as
> an underlying implementation which makes it difficult for implementations
> like Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) etc. to provide trusted keys
> support in case platform doesn't posses a TPM device.
>
> So this patch tries to add generic trusted keys framework where underlying
> implementations like TPM, TEE etc. could be easily plugged-in.
I would rephrase this a bit:
"Add a generic trusted keys framework where underlying implementations
can be easily plugged in. Create struct trusted_key_ops to achieve this,
which contains necessary functions of a backend."
I remember asking about this approach that what if there was just a
header for trusted key functions and a compile time decision, which C
file to include instead of ops struct. I don't remember if these was a
conclusion on this or not.
E.g. lets say you have a device with TEE and TPM, should you be able
to be use both at run-time? I might play along how this works now but
somehow, in the commit message preferably, it should be conclude why
one alternative is chosen over another.
/Jarkko
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list