[PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: mux-j7200-wiz: Add lane function defines
nm at ti.com
Thu Sep 17 09:00:33 EDT 2020
On 14:53-20200917, Peter Rosin wrote:
> I do not have a tree and dt-patches should normally not go *through* me.
> But I'd still like to see what's happening.
> I did not realize this was going to cause a *lot* of churn in the dt
> files. How bad can it be when the file is new in this cycle? And is it
> worth it? But it seems you all see problems with the current naming and
> in that case it must surely be better to fix it early?
yes - I think I can figure it out.
> And if it's a lot, maybe it needs to be more than one patch? I get the
> feeling this will need to be taken care of by someone other than me,
> because I'm just the maintainer of a very small subsystem and I don't
> normally have to deal with "big" issues involving several trees. I would
> be a bottleneck.
No a pain, I think I can help get it through, may be, I worry too much..
Lets see how the cleanup series looks like.
Roger: I am not touching the j7200 series till we cleanup j721e as
discussed in this thread. please use 5.9-rc1 as your baseline for
cleanup. Once available, we can figure out how to get 5.10-rc1 staged
items later. Window is narrowing rather soon, so appreciate a quick
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
More information about the linux-arm-kernel