[PATCH] arm64: Enable PCI write-combine resources under sysfs
Catalin Marinas
catalin.marinas at arm.com
Wed Sep 16 13:00:59 EDT 2020
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 03:15:02PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:48:52AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:33:16AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:40:06PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:17:38AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > > > With the patch, those device will now use MT_DEVICE_NC.
> > > >
> > > > Which doesn't do WC at all on some ARM implementations.
> > >
> > > Is that just TX2? I remember that thing being weird where GRE performed
> > > better than NC, but I thought that was a one off (and the thing is dead).
> >
> > I recall something along these lines. Hopefully ARM updated the guidance
> > to licensees.
> >
> > > NC is more permissive than GRE, so I think that's the right one to use; i.e.
> > > we go for the fewest number of restrictions on the hardware. If somebody
> > > screws up the uarch, that's up to them.
> >
> > I agree, Normal NC is better as long as the BAR can tolerate read
> > side-effects.
>
> That we don't know but if a prefetchable BAR can't tolerate read
> side effects this would be already a problem on eg x86 - that's
> the best we can hope for given the current PCI specs.
>
> +1 on normal NC. The only open point is whether we should make
> arch_can_pci_mmap_wc() return false on platforms like TX2.
I lost track in this thread whether it matters. TX2 would need Device
GRE for optimal performance but the kernel doesn't currently provide it
anyway. We could expose a new memory type, aligned_wc ;).
--
Catalin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list