[PATCH v10 09/24] coresight: etm3x: allow etm3x to be built as a module
Mathieu Poirier
mathieu.poirier at linaro.org
Mon Sep 14 11:45:13 EDT 2020
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:19:28AM +0800, Tingwei Zhang wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 09:17:05PM +0800, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> > On 08/21/2020 04:44 AM, Tingwei Zhang wrote:
> > >From: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips at arm.com>
> > >
> > >Allow to build coresight-etm3x as a module, for ease of development.
> > >
> > >- Kconfig becomes a tristate, to allow =m
> > >- append -core to source file name to allow module to
> > > be called coresight-etm3x by the Makefile
> > >- add an etm_remove function, for module unload
> > >- add a MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE for autoloading on boot
> > >
> > >Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier at linaro.org>
> > >Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan at linaro.org>
> > >Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin at linux.intel.com>
> > >Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org>
> > >Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose at arm.com>
> > >Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
> > >Cc: Russell King <linux at armlinux.org.uk>
> > >Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips at arm.com>
> > >Signed-off-by: Tingwei Zhang <tingwei at codeaurora.org>
> > >Reviewed-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach at linaro.org>
> >
> >
> > >diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c
> > b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x-core.c
> > >similarity index 97%
> > >rename from drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c
> > >rename to drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x-core.c
> > >index bf22dcfd3327..ba9c86497acb 100644
> > >--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x.c
> > >+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm3x-core.c
> > >@@ -895,6 +895,23 @@ static int etm_probe(struct amba_device *adev,
> > const struct amba_id *id)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >+static int __exit etm_remove(struct amba_device *adev)
> > >+{
> > >+ struct etm_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&adev->dev);
> > >+
> > >+ etm_perf_symlink(drvdata->csdev, false);
> > >+
> > >+ if (--etm_count == 0) {
> > >+
> > cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_ARM_CORESIGHT_STARTING);
> > >+ if (hp_online)
> > >+ cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(hp_online);
> > >+ }
> > >+
> > >+ coresight_unregister(drvdata->csdev);
> > >+
> > >+ return 0;
> > >+}
> > >+
> >
> > Don't we need to fix the races like we did for ETMv4 ?
> >
> > Suzuki
> >
> Yes, we need that. Unfortunately, I don't have ETMv3 devie to verify the
> change. Mathieu has been very kind to offer his help to take care of
> ETMv3.
Correct - I will do the testing but the implementation still has to come from
you.
>
> Thanks,
> Tingwei
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list