[PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: stacktrace: Convert to ARCH_STACKWALK
broonie at kernel.org
Thu Sep 10 13:34:14 EDT 2020
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 07:50:27PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 11:32:13AM +0200, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > > - start_backtrace(&frame,
> > > - (unsigned long)__builtin_frame_address(0),
> > > - (unsigned long)__save_stack_trace);
> Oh whoops; I'm annoyed I didn't spot that.
> With that gone this cannot work for (task == current && regs == NULL), as
> we'll erroneously use stale values from the task struct.
I remember somehow convincing myself at the time I originally did this
that doing the above was redundant with the new interface but that was
quite some time ago and I can't reconstruct my reasoning any more, I'm
pretty sure I was just mistaken. I've added it back in, thanks for
> It looks like the LKDTM tests only trigger cases with non-NULL regs, but
> IIUC this should show up with show_stack(NULL, NULL, KERN_INFO), as
> drivers/tty/sysrq.c does for other cpus.
show_stack() doesn't go through this bit of the stacktrace code, it goes
through dump_backtrace() in traps.c which used the underlying arch
specific unwinder directly so is unaffected by arch_stack_walk().
Actually now I look at LKDTM it's ending up using show_stack() mostly
if not entirely so my testing with it was not exercising this change
as much as might be expected anyway (the modified code was getting hit
by other things like /proc/N/stack).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the linux-arm-kernel