Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: aspeed: Format pinconf debug consistent with pinmux

[Andrew Jeffery]

On Thu, 10 Sep 2020, at 11:22, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 11:43, Andrew Jeffery <andrew at aj.id.au> wrote:
> >
> > When displaying which pinconf register and field is being touched, format the
> > field mask so that it's consistent with the way the pinmux portion
> > formats the mask.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew at aj.id.au>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c
> > index 53f3f8aec695..d8972911d505 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/aspeed/pinctrl-aspeed.c
> > @@ -539,9 +539,9 @@ int aspeed_pin_config_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int offset,
> >                 if (rc < 0)
> >                         return rc;
> >
> > -               pr_debug("%s: Set SCU%02X[%lu]=%d for param %d(=%d) on pin %d\n",
> > -                               __func__, pconf->reg, __ffs(pconf->mask),
> > -                               pmap->val, param, arg, offset);
> > +               pr_debug("%s: Set SCU%02X[0x%08X]=%d for param %d(=%d) on pin %d\n",
> 
> 
> The pr_debug in pinmux-aspeed.c prints val as 0x%X. Did you want to do
> that here?

Fair point, I'll do a v2.

Andrew