[PATCH RFC/RFT 0/3] efi/libstub: arm32: Remove dependency on dram_base
Atish Patra
atishp at atishpatra.org
Wed Sep 9 17:44:59 EDT 2020
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:52 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 08:16:20 PDT (-0700), ardb at kernel.org wrote:
> > Maxim reports boot failures on platforms that describe reserved memory
> > regions in DT that are disjoint from system DRAM, and which are converted
> > to EfiReservedMemory regions by the EFI subsystem in u-boot.
> >
> > As it turns out, the whole notion of discovering the base of DRAM is
> > problematic, and it would be better to simply rely on the EFI memory
> > allocation routines instead, and derive the FDT and initrd allocation
> > limits from the actual placement of the kernel (which is what defines
> > the start of the linear region anyway)
> >
> > Finally, we should be able to get rid of get_dram_base() entirely.
> > However, as RISC-V only just started using it, we will need to address
> > that at a later time.
>
> Looks like we're using dram_base to derive two argumets to
> efi_relocate_kernel(): the preferred load address and the minimum load address.
> I don't see any reason why we can't use the same PAGE_OFFSET-like logic that
> x86 uses for the minimum load address, but I don't think we have any mechanism
> like "struct boot_params" so we'd need to come up with something.
>
As discussed in the other thread
(https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-efi/msg20262.html),
we don't need to do anything special. efi_relocate_kernel can just
take preferred address as 0
so that efi_bs_alloc will fail and efi_low_alloc_above will be used to
allocate 2MB/4MB aligned address as per requirement.
I don't think the other changes in this series will cause any issue
for RISC-V. I will test it and update anyways.
> > Cc: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov at linaro.org>
> > Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk at gmx.de>
> > Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra at wdc.com>
> > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com>
> > Cc: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander at linaro.org>
> > Cc: Francois Ozog <francois.ozog at linaro.org>
> > Cc: Etienne CARRIERE <etienne.carriere at st.com>
> > Cc: Takahiro Akashi <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
> > Cc: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard at st.com>
> > Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg at linaro.org>
> > Cc: Grant Likely <Grant.Likely at arm.com>
> > Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas at linaro.org>
> > Cc: Christophe Priouzeau <christophe.priouzeau at linaro.org>
> > Cc: Rouven Czerwinski <r.czerwinski at pengutronix.de>
> > Cc: Patrick DELAUNAY <patrick.delaunay at st.com>
> >
> > Ard Biesheuvel (3):
> > efi/libstub: Export efi_low_alloc_above() to other units
> > efi/libstub: Use low allocation for the uncompressed kernel
> > efi/libstub: base FDT and initrd placement on image address not DRAM
> > base
> >
> > arch/arm/include/asm/efi.h | 6 +-
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/efi.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm32-stub.c | 177 ++++----------------
> > drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efi-stub.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/efistub.h | 3 +
> > drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/relocate.c | 4 +-
> > 6 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 147 deletions(-)
--
Regards,
Atish
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list