[PATCH 1/2] arm64/mm: Change THP helpers to comply with generic MM semantics

Ralph Campbell rcampbell at nvidia.com
Thu Sep 3 13:31:44 EDT 2020


On 9/3/20 9:56 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 02:49:43PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> pmd_present() and pmd_trans_huge() are expected to behave in the following
>> manner during various phases of a given PMD. It is derived from a previous
>> detailed discussion on this topic [1] and present THP documentation [2].
>>
>> pmd_present(pmd):
>>
>> - Returns true if pmd refers to system RAM with a valid pmd_page(pmd)
>> - Returns false if pmd does not refer to system RAM - Invalid pmd_page(pmd)
> 
> The second bullet doesn't make much sense. If you have a pmd mapping of
> some I/O memory, pmd_present() still returns true (as does
> pte_present()).
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
>> index 4d867c6446c4..28792fdd9627 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
>> @@ -19,6 +19,13 @@
>>   #define PTE_DEVMAP		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 57)
>>   #define PTE_PROT_NONE		(_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 58) /* only when !PTE_VALID */
>>   
>> +/*
>> + * This help indicate that the entry is present i.e pmd_page()
> 
> Nit: add another . after i.e

Another nit: "This help indicate" => "This helper indicates"

Maybe I should look at the series more. :-)



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list