[PATCH v3 09/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/locks: Move non page table modifying test together
Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com
Tue Sep 1 02:38:43 EDT 2020
On 9/1/20 9:11 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 08/27/2020 01:34 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> This will help in adding proper locks in a later patch
>
> It really makes sense to classify these tests here as static and dynamic.
> Static are the ones that test via page table entry values modification
> without changing anything on the actual page table itself. Where as the
> dynamic tests do change the page table. Static tests would probably never
> require any lock synchronization but the dynamic ones will do.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar at linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
>> index 0ce5c6a24c5b..78c8af3445ac 100644
>> --- a/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
>> +++ b/mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
>> @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ static int __init debug_vm_pgtable(void)
>> p4dp = p4d_alloc(mm, pgdp, vaddr);
>> pudp = pud_alloc(mm, p4dp, vaddr);
>> pmdp = pmd_alloc(mm, pudp, vaddr);
>> - ptep = pte_alloc_map_lock(mm, pmdp, vaddr, &ptl);
>> + ptep = pte_alloc_map(mm, pmdp, vaddr);
>>
>> /*
>> * Save all the page table page addresses as the page table
>> @@ -1012,33 +1012,12 @@ static int __init debug_vm_pgtable(void)
>> p4d_basic_tests(p4d_aligned, prot);
>> pgd_basic_tests(pgd_aligned, prot);
>>
>> - pte_clear_tests(mm, ptep, vaddr);
>> - pmd_clear_tests(mm, pmdp);
>> - pud_clear_tests(mm, pudp);
>> - p4d_clear_tests(mm, p4dp);
>> - pgd_clear_tests(mm, pgdp);
>> -
>> - pte_advanced_tests(mm, vma, ptep, pte_aligned, vaddr, prot);
>> - pmd_advanced_tests(mm, vma, pmdp, pmd_aligned, vaddr, prot, saved_ptep);
>> - pud_advanced_tests(mm, vma, pudp, pud_aligned, vaddr, prot);
>> - hugetlb_advanced_tests(mm, vma, ptep, pte_aligned, vaddr, prot);
>> -
>> pmd_leaf_tests(pmd_aligned, prot);
>> pud_leaf_tests(pud_aligned, prot);
>>
>> - pmd_huge_tests(pmdp, pmd_aligned, prot);
>> - pud_huge_tests(pudp, pud_aligned, prot);
>> -
>> pte_savedwrite_tests(pte_aligned, protnone);
>> pmd_savedwrite_tests(pmd_aligned, protnone);
>>
>> - pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
>> -
>> - pmd_populate_tests(mm, pmdp, saved_ptep);
>> - pud_populate_tests(mm, pudp, saved_pmdp);
>> - p4d_populate_tests(mm, p4dp, saved_pudp);
>> - pgd_populate_tests(mm, pgdp, saved_p4dp);
>> -
>> pte_special_tests(pte_aligned, prot);
>> pte_protnone_tests(pte_aligned, protnone);
>> pmd_protnone_tests(pmd_aligned, protnone);
>> @@ -1056,11 +1035,38 @@ static int __init debug_vm_pgtable(void)
>> pmd_swap_tests(pmd_aligned, prot);
>>
>> swap_migration_tests();
>> - hugetlb_basic_tests(pte_aligned, prot);
>>
>> pmd_thp_tests(pmd_aligned, prot);
>> pud_thp_tests(pud_aligned, prot);
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Page table modifying tests
>> + */
>
> In this comment, please do add some more details about how these tests
> need proper locking mechanism unlike the previous static ones. Also add
> a similar comment section for the static tests that dont really change
> page table and need not require corresponding locking mechanism. Both
> comment sections will make this classification clear.
>
>> + pte_clear_tests(mm, ptep, vaddr);
>> + pmd_clear_tests(mm, pmdp);
>> + pud_clear_tests(mm, pudp);
>> + p4d_clear_tests(mm, p4dp);
>> + pgd_clear_tests(mm, pgdp);
>> +
>> + ptep = pte_alloc_map_lock(mm, pmdp, vaddr, &ptl);
>> + pte_advanced_tests(mm, vma, ptep, pte_aligned, vaddr, prot);
>> + pmd_advanced_tests(mm, vma, pmdp, pmd_aligned, vaddr, prot, saved_ptep);
>> + pud_advanced_tests(mm, vma, pudp, pud_aligned, vaddr, prot);
>> + hugetlb_advanced_tests(mm, vma, ptep, pte_aligned, vaddr, prot);
>> +
>> +
>> + pmd_huge_tests(pmdp, pmd_aligned, prot);
>> + pud_huge_tests(pudp, pud_aligned, prot);
>> +
>> + pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
>> +
>> + pmd_populate_tests(mm, pmdp, saved_ptep);
>> + pud_populate_tests(mm, pudp, saved_pmdp);
>> + p4d_populate_tests(mm, p4dp, saved_pudp);
>> + pgd_populate_tests(mm, pgdp, saved_p4dp);
>> +
>> + hugetlb_basic_tests(pte_aligned, prot);
>
> hugetlb_basic_tests() is a non page table modifying static test and
> should be classified accordingly.
>
>> +
>> p4d_free(mm, saved_p4dp);
>> pud_free(mm, saved_pudp);
>> pmd_free(mm, saved_pmdp);
>>
>
> Changes till this patch fails to boot on arm64 platform. This should be
> folded with the next patch.
>
> [ 17.080644] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 17.081342] kernel BUG at mm/pgtable-generic.c:164!
> [ 17.082091] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> [ 17.082977] Modules linked in:
> [ 17.083481] CPU: 79 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc2-00105-g740e72cd6717 #14
> [ 17.084998] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> [ 17.085745] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO BTYPE=--)
> [ 17.086645] pc : pgtable_trans_huge_deposit+0x58/0x60
> [ 17.087462] lr : debug_vm_pgtable+0x4dc/0x8f0
> [ 17.088168] sp : ffff80001219bcf0
> [ 17.088710] x29: ffff80001219bcf0 x28: ffff8000114ac000
> [ 17.089574] x27: ffff8000114ac000 x26: 0020000000000fd3
> [ 17.090431] x25: 0020000081400fd3 x24: fffffe00175c12c0
> [ 17.091286] x23: ffff0005df04d1a8 x22: 0000f18d6e035000
> [ 17.092143] x21: ffff0005dd790000 x20: ffff0005df18e1a8
> [ 17.093003] x19: ffff0005df04cb80 x18: 0000000000000014
> [ 17.093859] x17: 00000000b76667d0 x16: 00000000fd4e6611
> [ 17.094716] x15: 0000000000000001 x14: 0000000000000002
> [ 17.095572] x13: 000000000055d966 x12: fffffe001755e400
> [ 17.096429] x11: 0000000000000008 x10: ffff0005fcb6e210
> [ 17.097292] x9 : ffff0005fcb6e210 x8 : 0020000081590fd3
> [ 17.098149] x7 : ffff0005dd71e0c0 x6 : ffff0005df18e1a8
> [ 17.099006] x5 : 0020000081590fd3 x4 : 0020000081590fd3
> [ 17.099862] x3 : ffff0005df18e1a8 x2 : fffffe00175c12c0
> [ 17.100718] x1 : fffffe00175c1300 x0 : 0000000000000000
> [ 17.101583] Call trace:
> [ 17.101993] pgtable_trans_huge_deposit+0x58/0x60
> [ 17.102754] do_one_initcall+0x74/0x1cc
> [ 17.103381] kernel_init_freeable+0x1d0/0x238
> [ 17.104089] kernel_init+0x14/0x118
> [ 17.104658] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x34
> [ 17.105251] Code: f9000443 f9000843 f9000822 d65f03c0 (d4210000)
> [ 17.106303] ---[ end trace e63471e00f8c147f ]---
>
IIUC, this should happen even without the series right? This is
assert_spin_locked(pmd_lockptr(mm, pmdp));
-aneesh
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list