[PATCH] arm64: kprobes: Remove redundant kprobe_step_ctx
Jean-Philippe Brucker
jean-philippe at linaro.org
Fri Oct 30 04:27:19 EDT 2020
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 10:13:08AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> The kprobe_step_ctx (kcb->ss_ctx) has ss_pending and match_addr, but
> those are redundant because those can be replaced by KPROBE_HIT_SS and
> &cur_kprobe->ainsn.api.insn[1] respectively.
> To simplify the code, remove the kprobe_step_ctx.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe at linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h | 7 -----
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 53 ++++++++----------------------------
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
> index 8699ce30f587..5d38ff4a4806 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h
> @@ -28,18 +28,11 @@ struct prev_kprobe {
> unsigned int status;
> };
>
> -/* Single step context for kprobe */
> -struct kprobe_step_ctx {
> - unsigned long ss_pending;
> - unsigned long match_addr;
> -};
> -
> /* per-cpu kprobe control block */
> struct kprobe_ctlblk {
> unsigned int kprobe_status;
> unsigned long saved_irqflag;
> struct prev_kprobe prev_kprobe;
> - struct kprobe_step_ctx ss_ctx;
> };
>
> void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> index ec1446ceacc9..3c74fc9e2acf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe_ctlblk, kprobe_ctlblk);
>
> static void __kprobes
> -post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe_ctlblk *, struct pt_regs *);
> +post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe *, struct kprobe_ctlblk *, struct pt_regs *);
>
> static int __kprobes patch_text(kprobe_opcode_t *addr, u32 opc1, u32 opc2)
> {
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static void __kprobes arch_simulate_insn(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
> p->ainsn.api.handler((u32)p->opcode, (long)p->addr, regs);
>
> /* single step simulated, now go for post processing */
> - post_kprobe_handler(kcb, regs);
> + post_kprobe_handler(p, kcb, regs);
> }
>
> int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
> @@ -184,19 +184,6 @@ static void __kprobes kprobes_restore_local_irqflag(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb,
> regs->pstate |= kcb->saved_irqflag;
> }
>
> -static void __kprobes
> -set_ss_context(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long addr)
> -{
> - kcb->ss_ctx.ss_pending = true;
> - kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr = addr + sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t);
> -}
> -
> -static void __kprobes clear_ss_context(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
> -{
> - kcb->ss_ctx.ss_pending = false;
> - kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr = 0;
> -}
> -
> static void __kprobes setup_singlestep(struct kprobe *p,
> struct pt_regs *regs,
> struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, int reenter)
> @@ -216,7 +203,6 @@ static void __kprobes setup_singlestep(struct kprobe *p,
> /* prepare for single stepping */
> slot = (unsigned long)p->ainsn.api.insn;
>
> - set_ss_context(kcb, slot); /* mark pending ss */
> kprobes_save_local_irqflag(kcb, regs);
> instruction_pointer_set(regs, slot);
> } else {
> @@ -250,13 +236,8 @@ static int __kprobes reenter_kprobe(struct kprobe *p,
> }
>
> static void __kprobes
> -post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +post_kprobe_handler(struct kprobe *cur, struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> - struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
> -
> - if (!cur)
> - return;
> -
> /* return addr restore if non-branching insn */
> if (cur->ainsn.api.restore != 0)
> instruction_pointer_set(regs, cur->ainsn.api.restore);
> @@ -371,33 +352,23 @@ static void __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> */
> }
>
> -static int __kprobes
> -kprobe_ss_hit(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb, unsigned long addr)
> -{
> - if ((kcb->ss_ctx.ss_pending)
> - && (kcb->ss_ctx.match_addr == addr)) {
> - clear_ss_context(kcb); /* clear pending ss */
> - return DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
> - }
> - /* not ours, kprobes should ignore it */
> - return DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
> -}
> -
> static int __kprobes
> kprobe_breakpoint_ss_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
> {
> struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
> - int retval;
> -
> - /* return error if this is not our step */
> - retval = kprobe_ss_hit(kcb, instruction_pointer(regs));
> + unsigned long addr = instruction_pointer(regs);
> + struct kprobe *cur = kprobe_running();
>
> - if (retval == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED) {
> + if (cur && (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_SS)
> + && ((unsigned long)&cur->ainsn.api.insn[1] == addr)) {
> kprobes_restore_local_irqflag(kcb, regs);
> - post_kprobe_handler(kcb, regs);
> + post_kprobe_handler(cur, kcb, regs);
> +
> + return DBG_HOOK_HANDLED;
> }
>
> - return retval;
> + /* not ours, kprobes should ignore it */
> + return DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
> }
>
> static struct break_hook kprobes_break_ss_hook = {
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list