[PATCH v3 04/16] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Add bus protection protocol

Weiyi Lu weiyi.lu at mediatek.com
Tue Oct 27 07:07:49 EDT 2020


On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 18:55 +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com>
> 
> Bus protection will need to update more then one register
> in infracfg. Add support for several operations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger at suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo at collabora.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2: None
> 
>  drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8173-pm-domains.h |  4 +--
>  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c    | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h    |  4 ++-
>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8173-pm-domains.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8173-pm-domains.h
> index a2a624bbd8b8..341cc287c8ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8173-pm-domains.h
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8173-pm-domains.h
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static const struct scpsys_domain_data scpsys_domain_data_mt8173[] = {
>  		.ctl_offs = SPM_DIS_PWR_CON,
>  		.sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(11, 8),
>  		.sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(12, 12),
> -		.bp_infracfg = {
> +		.bp_infracfg[0] = {
>  			.bus_prot_reg_update = true,
>  			.bus_prot_mask = MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MM_M0 |
>  				MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MM_M1,
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static const struct scpsys_domain_data scpsys_domain_data_mt8173[] = {
>  		.ctl_offs = SPM_MFG_PWR_CON,
>  		.sram_pdn_bits = GENMASK(13, 8),
>  		.sram_pdn_ack_bits = GENMASK(21, 16),
> -		.bp_infracfg = {
> +		.bp_infracfg[0] = {
>  			.bus_prot_reg_update = true,
>  			.bus_prot_mask = MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_S |
>  				MT8173_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_MFG_M0 |
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> index 16503d6db6a8..2121e05cb9a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c
> @@ -89,24 +89,40 @@ static int scpsys_sram_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
>  
>  static int scpsys_bus_protect_enable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
>  {
> -	const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bp_data = &pd->data->bp_infracfg;
> +	const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd = pd->data->bp_infracfg;
> +	int i, ret;
>  
> -	if (!bp_data->bus_prot_mask)
> -		return 0;
> +	for (i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {
> +		if (!bpd[i].bus_prot_mask)
> +			break;
>  
> -	return mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(pd->infracfg, bp_data->bus_prot_mask,
> -					       bp_data->bus_prot_reg_update);
> +		ret = mtk_infracfg_set_bus_protection(pd->infracfg,
> +						      bpd[i].bus_prot_mask,
> +						      bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int scpsys_bus_protect_disable(struct scpsys_domain *pd)
>  {
> -	const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bp_data = &pd->data->bp_infracfg;
> +	const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data *bpd = pd->data->bp_infracfg;
> +	int i, ret;
>  
> -	if (!bp_data->bus_prot_mask)
> -		return 0;
> +	for (i = 0; i < SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA; i++) {

I thought it should be

for (i = SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA - 1; i > 0; i--) {
	if (!bpd[i].bus_prot_mask)
		continue;

...

> +		if (!bpd[i].bus_prot_mask)
> +			return 0;
>  
> -	return mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(pd->infracfg, bp_data->bus_prot_mask,
> -						 bp_data->bus_prot_reg_update);
> +		ret = mtk_infracfg_clear_bus_protection(pd->infracfg,
> +							bpd[i].bus_prot_mask,
> +							bpd[i].bus_prot_reg_update);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int scpsys_power_on(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> index 7c8efcb3cef2..e428fe23a7e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
>  #define PWR_STATUS_AUDIO		BIT(24)
>  #define PWR_STATUS_USB			BIT(25)
>  
> +#define SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA		3
> +

#define SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA		5

to be compatible with MT8192

>  struct scpsys_bus_prot_data {
>  	u32 bus_prot_mask;
>  	bool bus_prot_reg_update;
> @@ -52,7 +54,7 @@ struct scpsys_domain_data {
>  	u32 sram_pdn_bits;
>  	u32 sram_pdn_ack_bits;
>  	u8 caps;
> -	const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data bp_infracfg;
> +	const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data bp_infracfg[SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA];
>  };
>  
>  struct scpsys_soc_data {



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list