[PATCH 01/11] firmware: arm_scmi: review protocol registration interface
Cristian Marussi
cristian.marussi at arm.com
Wed Oct 21 06:08:41 EDT 2020
On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 10:46:46PM -0400, Thara Gopinath wrote:
> Hi Cristian,
>
> Thanks for this series!
>
Hi Thara,
thanks for reviewing.
> On 10/14/20 11:05 AM, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> > Extend common protocol registration routines and provide some new generic
> > protocols' init/deinit helpers that tracks protocols' users and automatically
> > perform the proper initialization/de-initialization on demand.
> >
> > Convert all protocols to use new registration schema while modifying only Base
> > protocol to use also the new initialization helpers.
> >
> > All other standard protocols' initialization is still umodified and bound to
> > SCMI devices probing.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi at arm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c | 10 +-
> > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c | 61 +++++++---
> > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 10 +-
> > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 31 ++++-
> > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 168 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c | 3 +-
> > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 10 +-
> > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/power.c | 10 +-
> > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/reset.c | 10 +-
> > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 10 +-
> > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/system.c | 8 +-
> > include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 6 +-
> > 12 files changed, 298 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c
> > index 017e5d8bd869..f19e08ed4369 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c
> > @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static const struct scmi_event_ops base_event_ops = {
> > .fill_custom_report = scmi_base_fill_custom_report,
> > };
> > -int scmi_base_protocol_init(struct scmi_handle *h)
> > +static int scmi_base_protocol_init(struct scmi_handle *h)
> > {
> > int id, ret;
> > u8 *prot_imp;
> > @@ -365,3 +365,11 @@ int scmi_base_protocol_init(struct scmi_handle *h)
> > return 0;
> > }
> > +
> > +static struct scmi_protocol scmi_base = {
> > + .id = SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE,
> > + .init = &scmi_base_protocol_init,
> > + .ops = NULL,
> > +};
> > +
> > +DEFINE_SCMI_PROTOCOL_REGISTER_UNREGISTER(base, scmi_base)
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> > index 1377ec76a45d..afa2e4818a2b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c
> > @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
> > #include "common.h"
> > static DEFINE_IDA(scmi_bus_id);
> > -static DEFINE_IDR(scmi_protocols);
> > +static DEFINE_IDR(scmi_available_protocols);
> > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(protocol_lock);
> > static const struct scmi_device_id *
> > @@ -51,13 +51,29 @@ static int scmi_dev_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> > return 0;
> > }
> > +const struct scmi_protocol *scmi_get_protocol(int protocol_id)
> > +{
> > + const struct scmi_protocol *proto;
> > +
> > + proto = idr_find(&scmi_available_protocols, protocol_id);
> > + if (!proto) {
> > + pr_warn("SCMI Protocol 0x%x not found!\n", protocol_id);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + pr_debug("GOT SCMI Protocol 0x%x\n", protocol_id);
> > +
> > + return proto;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int scmi_protocol_init(int protocol_id, struct scmi_handle *handle)
> > {
> > - scmi_prot_init_fn_t fn = idr_find(&scmi_protocols, protocol_id);
> > + const struct scmi_protocol *proto;
> > - if (unlikely(!fn))
> > + proto = idr_find(&scmi_available_protocols, protocol_id);
> > + if (!proto)
> > return -EINVAL;
>
>
> Any reason not to use the above scmi_get_protocol here ?
>
You're right I spotted this awkward thing but I left it because the
whole scmi_protocol_init() is removed later on in this series, moving
proto initialization to when the protocol is requested, so it seemed
silly to fix code that I'm going to remove as a whole in the same
series.
Probably I could split the whole series better to avoid this. (or fix
it anyway and later removed)
> > - return fn(handle);
> > + return proto->init(handle);
> > }
> > static int scmi_protocol_dummy_init(struct scmi_handle *handle)
> > @@ -84,7 +100,7 @@ static int scmi_dev_probe(struct device *dev)
> > return ret;
> > /* Skip protocol initialisation for additional devices */
> > - idr_replace(&scmi_protocols, &scmi_protocol_dummy_init,
> > + idr_replace(&scmi_available_protocols, &scmi_protocol_dummy_init,
> > scmi_dev->protocol_id);
> > return scmi_drv->probe(scmi_dev);
> > @@ -194,26 +210,45 @@ void scmi_set_handle(struct scmi_device *scmi_dev)
> > scmi_dev->handle = scmi_handle_get(&scmi_dev->dev);
> > }
> > -int scmi_protocol_register(int protocol_id, scmi_prot_init_fn_t fn)
> > +int scmi_protocol_register(struct scmi_protocol *proto)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > + if (!proto) {
> > + pr_err("invalid protocol\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!proto->init) {
> > + pr_err("missing .init() for protocol 0x%x\n", proto->id);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > spin_lock(&protocol_lock);
> > - ret = idr_alloc(&scmi_protocols, fn, protocol_id, protocol_id + 1,
> > - GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + ret = idr_alloc(&scmi_available_protocols, proto,
> > + proto->id, proto->id + 1, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > spin_unlock(&protocol_lock);
> > - if (ret != protocol_id)
> > - pr_err("unable to allocate SCMI idr slot, err %d\n", ret);
> > + if (ret != proto->id) {
> > + pr_err("unable to allocate SCMI idr slot for 0x%x - err %d\n",
> > + proto->id, ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + pr_debug("Registered SCMI Protocol 0x%x\n", proto->id);
> > - return ret;
> > + return 0;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scmi_protocol_register);
> > -void scmi_protocol_unregister(int protocol_id)
> > +void scmi_protocol_unregister(const struct scmi_protocol *proto)
> > {
> > spin_lock(&protocol_lock);
> > - idr_remove(&scmi_protocols, protocol_id);
> > + idr_remove(&scmi_available_protocols, proto->id);
> > spin_unlock(&protocol_lock);
> > +
> > + pr_debug("Unregistered SCMI Protocol 0x%x\n", proto->id);
> > +
> > + return;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scmi_protocol_unregister);
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> > index 3dfd8b6a0ebf..7de994e49884 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> > #include <linux/of_address.h>
> > #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > #include <linux/processor.h>
> > +#include <linux/refcount.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include "common.h"
> > @@ -68,6 +69,21 @@ struct scmi_xfers_info {
> > spinlock_t xfer_lock;
> > };
> > +/**
> > + * struct scmi_protocol_instance - Describe an initialized protocol instance.
> > + * @proto: A reference to the protocol descriptor.
> > + * @gid: A reference for per-protocol devres management.
> > + * @users: A refcount to track effective users of this protocol.
> > + *
> > + * Each protocol is initialized independently once for each SCMI platform in
> > + * which is defined by DT and implemented by the SCMI server fw.
> > + */
> > +struct scmi_protocol_instance {
> > + const struct scmi_protocol *proto;
> > + void *gid;
> > + refcount_t users;
> > +};
> > +
> > /**
> > * struct scmi_info - Structure representing a SCMI instance
> > *
> > @@ -80,6 +96,10 @@ struct scmi_xfers_info {
> > * @rx_minfo: Universal Receive Message management info
> > * @tx_idr: IDR object to map protocol id to Tx channel info pointer
> > * @rx_idr: IDR object to map protocol id to Rx channel info pointer
> > + * @protocols: An array of protocols' instance descriptors initialized for
> > + * this SCMI instance: populated on protocol's first attempted
> > + * usage.
> > + * @protocols_mtx: A mutex to protect protocols instances initialization.
> > * @protocols_imp: List of protocols implemented, currently maximum of
> > * MAX_PROTOCOLS_IMP elements allocated by the base protocol
> > * @node: List head
> > @@ -94,6 +114,9 @@ struct scmi_info {
> > struct scmi_xfers_info rx_minfo;
> > struct idr tx_idr;
> > struct idr rx_idr;
> > + struct scmi_protocol_instance *protocols[SCMI_MAX_PROTO];
> > + /* Ensure mutual exclusive access to protocols instance array */
> > + struct mutex protocols_mtx;
> > u8 *protocols_imp;
> > struct list_head node;
> > int users;
> > @@ -519,6 +542,132 @@ int scmi_version_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol,
> > return ret;
> > }
> > +/**
> > + * scmi_get_protocol_instance - Protocol initialization helper.
> > + * @handle: A reference to the SCMI platform instance.
> > + * @protocol_id: The protocol being requested.
> > + *
> > + * In case the required protocol has never been requested before for this
> > + * instance, allocate and initialize all the needed structures while handling
> > + * resource allocation with a dedicated per-protocol devres subgroup.
> > + *
> > + * Return: A reference to an initialized protocol instance or error on failure.
> > + */
> > +static struct scmi_protocol_instance * __must_check
> > +scmi_get_protocol_instance(struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol_id)
> > +{
> > + int ret = -ENOMEM;
> > + void *gid;
> > + struct scmi_protocol_instance *pi;
> > + struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle);
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&info->protocols_mtx);
> > + /* Ensure protocols has been updated */
> > + smp_rmb();
> > + pi = info->protocols[protocol_id];
> > +
> > + if (!pi) {
> > + const struct scmi_protocol *proto;
> > +
> > + /* Fail if protocol not registered on bus */
> > + proto = scmi_get_protocol(protocol_id);
> > + if (!proto) {
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Protocol specific devres group */
> > + gid = devres_open_group(handle->dev, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!gid)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + pi = devm_kzalloc(handle->dev, sizeof(*pi), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!pi)
> > + goto clean;
> > +
> > + pi->gid = gid;
> > + pi->proto = proto;
> > + refcount_set(&pi->users, 1);
> > + /* proto->init is assured NON NULL by scmi_protocol_register */
> > + ret = pi->proto->init(handle);
>
> Isnt this already done in scmi_protocol_init? Or rather the init should
> remain here and there is no need for it to be called from
> scmi_protocol_init?
>
So, basically I introduced a new initialization flow triggered by
scmi_acquire_protocol (and later in the series by get_ops), so that
protocols won't be anymore initialized by scmi_protocol_init() during
dev prove but later on when used effectively (acquire/get_ops) so that
I can track their usage, but in this patch I ported only base protocol
to this new flow while keeping other protos the old way...so again maybe
I could split this series better in V2, maybe merging all these protos
changes in one go
Regards
Cristian
>
>
> --
> Warm Regards
> Thara
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list