[PATCH v4 2/5] arm64: mremap speedup - Enable HAVE_MOVE_PMD

[Will Deacon]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:53:07AM +0000, Kalesh Singh wrote:
> HAVE_MOVE_PMD enables remapping pages at the PMD level if both the
> source and destination addresses are PMD-aligned.
> 
> HAVE_MOVE_PMD is already enabled on x86. The original patch [1] that
> introduced this config did not enable it on arm64 at the time because
> of performance issues with flushing the TLB on every PMD move. These
> issues have since been addressed in more recent releases with
> improvements to the arm64 TLB invalidation and core mmu_gather code as
> Will Deacon mentioned in [2].
> 
> From the data below, it can be inferred that there is approximately
> 8x improvement in performance when HAVE_MOVE_PMD is enabled on arm64.
> 
> --------- Test Results ----------
> 
> The following results were obtained on an arm64 device running a 5.4
> kernel, by remapping a PMD-aligned, 1GB sized region to a PMD-aligned
> destination. The results from 10 iterations of the test are given below.
> All times are in nanoseconds.
> 
> Control    HAVE_MOVE_PMD
> 
> 9220833    1247761
> 9002552    1219896
> 9254115    1094792
> 8725885    1227760
> 9308646    1043698
> 9001667    1101771
> 8793385    1159896
> 8774636    1143594
> 9553125    1025833
> 9374010    1078125
> 
> 9100885.4  1134312.6    <-- Mean Time in nanoseconds
> 
> Total mremap time for a 1GB sized PMD-aligned region drops from
> ~9.1 milliseconds to ~1.1 milliseconds. (~8x speedup).
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20181108181201.88826-3-joelaf@google.com
> [2] https://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org/msg140837.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh at google.com>
> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
>   - Add Kirill's Acked-by.

Argh, I thought we already enabled this for PMDs back in 2018! Looks like
that we forgot to actually do that after I improved the performance of
the TLB invalidation.

I'll pick this one patch up for 5.10.

Will