[PATCH RFC v4 00/13] perf pmu-events: Support event aliasing for system PMUs

[John Garry]

On 14/10/2020 12:16, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> My thought was that since the kernel part needs acceptance first [0], which
>> is based on v5.9-rc7, I would just use the same baseline here.
>>
>> However I suppose I should still use Arnaldo's perf/core from now on as
>> baseline, so I'll look at that now.
> yes please, I can't already apply 2nd patch..
> 
> 	patching file pmu-events/jevents.c
> 	Hunk #1 succeeded at 82 with fuzz 2 (offset 29 lines).
> 	Hunk #2 FAILED at 335.
> 	Hunk #3 FAILED at 354.
> 	Hunk #4 succeeded at 406 (offset 22 lines).
> 	Hunk #5 FAILED at 439.
> 	Hunk #6 FAILED at 531.
> 	Hunk #7 FAILED at 555.
> 	Hunk #8 FAILED at 602.
> 	Hunk #9 FAILED at 698.
> 	Hunk #10 succeeded at 770 (offset 2 lines).
> 	Hunk #11 succeeded at 813 (offset 2 lines).
> 	Hunk #12 succeeded at 1075 (offset 2 lines).
> 	Hunk #13 succeeded at 1242 (offset 2 lines).
> 	Hunk #14 succeeded at 1273 (offset 2 lines).
> 	7 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file pmu-events/jevents.c.rej
> 	can't find file to patch at input line 439

OK, so I already did the rebase and it was quite straightforward - the 
conflicts came with the recent changes in jevents.

I will send out soon.

Thanks,
John