linux-next: manual merge of the sunxi tree with the arm-soc tree

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi Stephen,

On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 02:56:37PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the sunxi tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a100.dtsi
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   0dea1794f3b4 ("arm64: allwinner: A100: add the basical Allwinner A100 DTSI file")
> 
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
> 
>   7e66a778cb8b ("arm64: allwinner: A100: add the basical Allwinner A100 DTSI file")
> 
> from the sunxi tree.
> 
> These are 2 versions of the same patch.  For now I am just using the
> version in the arm-soc tree ... please sort this out.
> 
> I fixed it up (see above) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

The branch in arm-soc has a build breakage (that doesn't happen in
linux-next since the clk tree has the commit to fix it) so I sent a new
PR

Once that PR is in arm-soc, I guess that merge issue will go away

maxime
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20201008/276ad110/attachment.sig>