[PATCH v4 3/4] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add structure device pointer in probe

[Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini]

Hi Michal,

Thanks for the comment. I replied inline

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com>
>Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2020 3:35 PM
>To: Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli at intel.com>;
>Hunter, Adrian <adrian.hunter at intel.com>; michal.simek at xilinx.com;
>Shevchenko, Andriy <andriy.shevchenko at intel.com>; ulf.hansson at linaro.org;
>linux-mmc at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-
>kernel at vger.kernel.org
>Cc: Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi Bai <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian at intel.com>;
>Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad Zainie
><wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad at intel.com>; arnd at arndb.de
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Add structure device pointer
>in probe
>
>
>
>On 08. 10. 20 4:09, muhammad.husaini.zulkifli at intel.com wrote:
>> From: Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli at intel.com>
>>
>> Add struct device *dev in probe func() so that it can widely use in
>> probe to make code more readable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Husaini Zulkifli
>> <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
>> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
>> index f186fbd016b1..46aea6516133 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
>> @@ -1521,6 +1521,7 @@ static int sdhci_arasan_probe(struct
>platform_device *pdev)
>>  	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host;
>>  	struct sdhci_arasan_data *sdhci_arasan;
>>  	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>  	const struct sdhci_arasan_of_data *data;
>>
>>  	match = of_match_node(sdhci_arasan_of_match, pdev->dev.of_node);
>>
>
>This is not what we discussed. You create new variable and you should just use it
>in that function.
>
>s/pdev->dev\./dev->/g

For widely used in future, we plan to put it here and not specific to Keembay function only.
Any comment on this @Andy Shevchenko?
Thanks
>
>Thanks,
>Michal