[PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: modify some default clks are critical

Ryan Chen ryan_chen at aspeedtech.com
Wed Oct 7 22:33:50 EDT 2020


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel Stanley <joel at jms.id.au>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 7:34 PM
> To: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen at aspeedtech.com>
> Cc: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo at linux.intel.com>; Andrew Jeffery
> <andrew at aj.id.au>; Michael Turquette <mturquette at baylibre.com>; Stephen
> Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org>; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org; Linux ARM
> <linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org>; linux-aspeed
> <linux-aspeed at lists.ozlabs.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> <linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org>; BMC-SW <BMC-SW at aspeedtech.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: modify some default clks are critical
> 
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 08:40, Ryan Chen <ryan_chen at aspeedtech.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Joel Stanley <joel at jms.id.au>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 4:04 PM
> > > To: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen at aspeedtech.com>; Jae Hyun Yoo
> > > <jae.hyun.yoo at linux.intel.com>; Andrew Jeffery <andrew at aj.id.au>
> > > Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette at baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd
> > > <sboyd at kernel.org>; linux-clk at vger.kernel.org; Linux ARM
> > > <linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org>; linux-aspeed
> > > <linux-aspeed at lists.ozlabs.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> > > <linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org>; BMC-SW <BMC-SW at aspeedtech.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: modify some default clks are
> > > critical
> > >
> > > On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 07:01, Ryan Chen <ryan_chen at aspeedtech.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > In ASPEED SoC LCLK is LPC clock for all SuperIO device,
> > > > UART1/UART2 are default for Host SuperIO UART device, eSPI clk for
> > > > Host eSPI bus access eSPI slave channel, those clks can't be
> > > > disable should keep default, otherwise will affect Host side access
> SuperIO and SPI slave device.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen <ryan_chen at aspeedtech.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c  | 8 ++++----  drivers/clk/clk-ast2600.c
> > > > | 8
> > > > ++++----
> > > >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c b/drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c
> > > > index 411ff5fb2c07..d348c4fd3f9f 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-aspeed.c
> > > > @@ -54,15 +54,15 @@ static const struct aspeed_gate_data
> > > > aspeed_gates[]
> > > = {
> > > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_DCLK] =        {  5, -1, "dclk-gate",
> > > NULL,   CLK_IS_CRITICAL }, /* DAC */
> > > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_REFCLK] =      {  6, -1, "refclk-gate",
> > > "clkin", CLK_IS_CRITICAL },
> > > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_USBPORT2CLK] = {  7,  3,
> > > > "usb-port2-gate",
> > > NULL,   0 }, /* USB2.0 Host port 2 */
> > > > -       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_LCLK] =        {  8,  5, "lclk-gate",
> > > NULL,   0 }, /* LPC */
> > > > +       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_LCLK] =        {  8,  5, "lclk-gate",
> > > NULL,   CLK_IS_CRITICAL }, /* LPC */
> > > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_USBUHCICLK] =  {  9, 15,
> "usb-uhci-gate",
> > > NULL,   0 }, /* USB1.1 (requires port 2 enabled) */
> > > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_D1CLK] =       { 10, 13, "d1clk-gate",
> > > NULL,   0 }, /* GFX CRT */
> > > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_YCLK] =        { 13,  4, "yclk-gate",
> > > NULL,   0 }, /* HAC */
> > > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_USBPORT1CLK] = { 14, 14,
> > > > "usb-port1-gate",
> > > NULL,   0 }, /* USB2 hub/USB2 host port 1/USB1.1 dev */
> > > > -       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_UART1CLK] =    { 15, -1, "uart1clk-gate",
> > > "uart", 0 }, /* UART1 */
> > > > -       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_UART2CLK] =    { 16, -1, "uart2clk-gate",
> > > "uart", 0 }, /* UART2 */
> > > > +       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_UART1CLK] =    { 15, -1, "uart1clk-gate",
> > > "uart", CLK_IS_CRITICAL }, /* UART1 */
> > > > +       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_UART2CLK] =    { 16, -1, "uart2clk-gate",
> > > "uart", CLK_IS_CRITICAL }, /* UART2 */
> > > >         [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_UART5CLK] =    { 17, -1,
> "uart5clk-gate",
> > > "uart", 0 }, /* UART5 */
> > > > -       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_ESPICLK] =     { 19, -1, "espiclk-gate",
> > > NULL,   0 }, /* eSPI */
> > > > +       [ASPEED_CLK_GATE_ESPICLK] =     { 19, -1, "espiclk-gate",
> > > NULL,   CLK_IS_CRITICAL }, /* eSPI */
> > >
> > > This is fine for systems that have eSPI. For systems that do not use
> > > eSPI, the clocks are not "required".
> > >
> > > I was sent a similar patch by Jae some time ago:
> > >
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/openbmc/697a184b-ef99-a46e-bf98-4d339b3aafd8
> > > @lin
> > > ux.intel.com/
> > >
> > > Better is to associate drivers with these clocks, and those drivers
> > > will ensure they are left enabled.
> > >
> > > Alternatively, we will need to come up with a device tree binding to
> > > describe the hardware requirement that these clocks are left on.
> > >
> > ASPEED BMC SoC have SuperIO device that default enable, even without
> BMC fw boot.
> > Host can use SUART1/SUART2/GPIO....
> > That the reason even Linux kernel boot should not change the SoC default clk,
> that is the impact.
> 
> Ok, that makes sense. Linux will not enable these clocks if a driver is loaded
> for them though, so we should load a driver for them.
> 
> ESPI: We do not have an upstream driver for eSPI, but once you submit one this
> will solve the eSPI issue.
> 
> LPC: The existing LPC driver will enable the clock, so by loading that this clock
> will be left enabled.
> 
> UART1/UART2: This is harder, as the SUART mode means the BMC does not
> load a driver for these devices. We could add a property to the device tree to
> describe the clocks that must be left on?

That following the example,
BMC is stop in u-boot stage, the eSPI and LPC UART1/2 can still work fine. 
But after boot into Linux, the eSPI and SUART1/2 can't work anymore, 
it is disappear. That is not consistence between U-boot and kernel. 
The reason is the same with AST SoC also have VGA device capability.

And another point of view, clk framework provide CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag 
to support this, instead add more driver for this.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list